Literature DB >> 17943692

German primary care doctors' awareness of osteoporosis and knowledge of national guidelines.

R Chenot1, C Scheidt-Nave, S Gabler, M M Kochen, W Himmel.   

Abstract

AIMS: With the aging of populations in industrialized countries, managing osteoporosis in the primary care setting becomes increasingly important. General practitioners (GPs) are in an ideal position to identify and manage patients who are at an increased risk of osteoporosis and fracture. In a cross-sectional survey we studied whether German GPs (1) are aware of osteoporosis as an urgent health problem, (2) felt competent to manage patients with osteoporosis, (3) knew and used the national guideline for osteoporosis treatment and if not, (4) which barriers prevented them from doing so. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A representative random sample of German GPs were sent a 30-item standardized questionnaire by mail. Chi-square statistics and multiple logistic regression were used to detect associations between knowledge of guidelines and explanatory variables.
RESULTS: Of 2,194 doctors addressed, 892 (41.1%) answered the questionnaire. The majority of doctors (82.7%) felt competent in osteoporosis management (95% confidence interval: 80.2 - 85.2) and only 11.2% (8.2 - 13.1) did not consider osteoporosis an important problem in their practice. About half (459/892) reported knowing the national osteoporosis guideline well (51.7%; 48.4 - 55.0), whereas 22.6% (19.9 - 25.4) admitted to not being familiar with it at all. Knowledge of the guideline was positively associated with being a female doctor (OR=1.36; 1.01-1.85), having Internet access (OR=1.40, 1.06 - 1.85), seeing institutionalized patients (OR=1.67; 1.03 -2.69), and caring for patients with osteoporosis at a higher frequency (OR=2.60; 1.93 - 3.50). Nearly 43% (39.7 - 46.2) used the guideline in their practice without problems. In free-text fields, GPs reported most frequently that budgetary restrictions preventing the prescription of appropriate medication represented a severe problem for osteoporosis management.
CONCLUSION: Although most GPs are aware of osteoporosis as an important health problem and felt competent in the management of this disease, only half of the respondents knew and used the national guideline. This may explain deficits in diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis in Germany. Since guideline knowledge and frequency of consultations for osteoporosis strongly correlate, proper dissemination of the guideline may further enhance awareness of, and evidence-based treatment for, osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17943692     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-981454

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes        ISSN: 0947-7349            Impact factor:   2.949


  15 in total

1.  Access to fracture risk assessment by FRAX and linked National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidance in the UK-an analysis of anonymous website activity.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; H Johansson; N C Harvey; J Compston; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Perception, knowledge, and use by general practitioners of Belgium of a new WHO tool (FRAX) to assess the 10-year probability of fracture.

Authors:  O Bruyère; D Nicolet; S Compère; V Rabenda; P Jeholet; B Zegels; P Maassen; G Pire; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Osteoporosis pharmacotherapy following bone densitometry: importance of patient beliefs and understanding of DXA results.

Authors:  D Brask-Lindemann; S M Cadarette; P Eskildsen; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Osteoporosis guideline awareness among Iranian family physicians: results of a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey.

Authors:  Hamideh Mahdaviazad; Vahid Keshtkar; Mohammad Jafar Emami
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 1.458

5.  A clinical trial alert tool to recruit large patient samples and assess selection bias in general practice research.

Authors:  Stephanie Heinemann; Sabine Thüring; Sven Wedeken; Tobias Schäfer; Christa Scheidt-Nave; Mirko Ketterer; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Effect of distributing an evidence-based guideline for prevention of osteoporosis on health education programs in municipal health centers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yoshimi Nakatani; Junko Tamaki; Misa Komatsu; Masayuki Iki; Etsuko Kajita
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-31       Impact factor: 3.211

7.  Managing Osteoporosis: A Survey of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices among Primary Care Physicians in Israel.

Authors:  Yacov Fogelman; Inbal Goldshtein; Elena Segal; Sofia Ish-Shalom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  General practitioner's clinical practices, difficulties and educational needs to manage Alzheimer's disease in France: analysis of national telephone-inquiry data.

Authors:  Dominique Somme; Arnaud Gautier; Stéphanie Pin; Aline Corvol
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Osteoporosis: are healthcare professionals missing an opportunity.

Authors:  Yusra Habib Khan; Tauqeer Hussain Mallhi; Azmi Sarriff; Amer Hayat Khan
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-09-14

10.  Osteoporosis awareness among primary care physicians in Malaysia.

Authors:  Esha Das Gupta; Emily Man Lee Goh; Suk Chyn Gun; Heselynn Hussein; Nor Shuhaila Shahril; Swan Sim Yeap; Rajalingham Sakthiswary
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.068

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.