Literature DB >> 20101492

Persistence and switching patterns among women with varied osteoporosis medication histories: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US.

A N A Tosteson1, T P Do, S W Wade, M S Anthony, R W Downs.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: During the first year of Prospective Observational Scientific Study Investigating Bone Loss Experience (POSSIBE US), many women transitioned (i.e., discontinued or switched) from their baseline osteoporosis medication. Participants not on stable therapy at entry, with side effects, and with poor physical status were at higher risk of transitioning. Understanding factors associated with persistence may lead to improved outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) medication use patterns may differ by treatment history and drug class. We describe these patterns among patients in primary care settings using patient-reported data.
METHODS: Data from 3,006 participants of the POSSIBLE US were used to estimate the probability of a baseline PMO medication transition (i.e., discontinuation or switch) and hazard ratios (HRs) for predictors of these transitions.
RESULTS: One year after study entry, the probability of persisting with a baseline medication was 66% (95% CI: 64-68%). After adjusting for age and osteoporosis diagnosis, factors at entry independently associated with a higher risk of baseline medication transition were treatment status cohort, side effect severity, and OPAQ-SV physical function score. Compared to participants stable on therapy at entry, others had a higher risk, ranging from HR = 1.59 (95% CI: 1.36-1.85) for those new to therapy to HR = 2.00 (95% CI: 1.27-3.15) for those who recently augmented therapy at entry. Participants reporting moderate (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09-1.57) or severe (HR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.49-2.39) side effects had a higher risk than those not reporting side effects. Participants reporting Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire-Short Version physical function scores in the lowest tertile had a higher risk (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.07-1.52) than those reporting scores in the highest tertile.
CONCLUSION: Baseline osteoporosis medication transitions were common in the first year of POSSIBLE US. Participants not on stable therapy at entry, or who reported severe side effects, or had poor physical health status were at higher risk for these transitions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20101492     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-009-1133-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  18 in total

1.  Failure of estrogen plus progestin therapy for prevention.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Jacques E Rossouw
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  2002-05

Review 3.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Adherence and persistence associated with the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis in a managed care setting.

Authors:  Timothy W Downey; Susan H Foltz; Stephen J Boccuzzi; Mohamed A Omar; Kristijan H Kahler
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Postmenopausal hormonal support: discontinuation of raloxifene versus estrogen.

Authors:  J Kayser; B Ettinger; A Pressman
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  The impact of osteoporosis medication beliefs and side-effect experiences on non-adherence to oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Colleen A McHorney; John T Schousboe; Richard R Cline; Thomas W Weiss
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.580

8.  Early discontinuation of treatment for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Margaret R Grove; Cristina S Hammond; Megan M Moncur; G Thomas Ray; Gwen M Hebert; Alice R Pressman; Bruce Ettinger
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Fracture outcomes related to persistence and compliance with oral bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Arlene M Gallagher; Stephan Rietbrock; Melvin Olson; Tjeerd P van Staa
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Design of the POSSIBLE UStrade mark Study: postmenopausal women's compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; K Ensrud; A N A Tosteson; S F Varon; M Anthony; N Daizadeh; S Wade
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  15 in total

1.  Self-reported calcium use in a cohort of postmenopausal women receiving osteoporosis therapy: results from POSSIBLE US™.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; S W Wade; R W Downs; T Ganiats; M Hochberg; R R Recker; B S Stolshek
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Osteoporosis pharmacotherapy following bone densitometry: importance of patient beliefs and understanding of DXA results.

Authors:  D Brask-Lindemann; S M Cadarette; P Eskildsen; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Physician differences in managing postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the POSSIBLE US™ treatment registry study.

Authors:  Barbara Lukert; Sacha Satram-Hoang; Sally Wade; Mary Anthony; Guozhi Gao; Robert Downs
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Treatment satisfaction and persistence among postmenopausal women on osteoporosis medications: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US™.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; S W Wade; T P Do; S Satram-Hoang; R Stewart; G Gao; D Macarios
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  B Jönsson; O Ström; J A Eisman; A Papaioannou; E S Siris; A Tosteson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Management of oral bisphosphonates treatment by rheumatologists and determinants of therapeutic changes: a case-vignette-based study.

Authors:  C Roux; G Baron; K Briot; B Roux; B Cortet; T Thomas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Long-term persistence and switching patterns among women using osteoporosis therapies: 24- and 36-month results from POSSIBLE US™.

Authors:  S W Wade; S Satram-Hoang; B S Stolshek
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Prevalence of Fracture Risk Factors in Postmenopausal Women Enrolled in the POSSIBLE US Treatment Cohort.

Authors:  Nicole Yurgin; Sally Wade; Sacha Satram-Hoang; David Macarios; Marc Hochberg
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-03-31       Impact factor: 3.257

10.  Development of the Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire--physical Function (OPAQ-PF): an osteoporosis-targeted, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure of physical function.

Authors:  A N Naegeli; A Nixon; R Burge; D T Gold; S Silverman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.