Literature DB >> 23794044

Factors influencing the pharmacological management of osteoporosis after fragility fracture: results from the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy's fracture clinic screening program.

D E Beaton1, S Dyer, D Jiang, R Sujic, M Slater, J E M Sale, E R Bogoch.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Potential mediating factors in the pathway to initiation of osteoporosis treatment following a fragility fracture were evaluated. Patients' perceived need for treatment, mediated by their perception of bone density test results, was central to treatment initiation. Interventions focusing on patients' perceptions of need and test results may improve treatment rates.
INTRODUCTION: We tested a hypothesized pathway to osteoporosis (OP) pharmacotherapy initiation in fragility fracture patients. We hypothesized that bone mineral density (BMD) testing is strongly associated with treatment initiation and perception of BMD test results would inform patients' perceived need for treatment, which would mediate the effect between BMD testing and treatment initiation.
METHODS: A longitudinal cohort study followed patients, ≥50 years of age, screened for fragility fracture in 31 fracture clinics in Ontario, Canada who had no prior diagnosis of or treatment for OP. At screening, OP risk factors, baseline-patient perception of OP risk, OP knowledge, and perceived benefits of medication were reported by patients. Patients were followed up within 6 months of fracture to determine BMD testing and prescription of and adherence to first-line OP pharmacotherapy. Structural equation modeling tested the hypothesized pathway. Significance and magnitude of the coefficients and indicators of overall model fit were used to test our model.
RESULTS: The direct path from BMD testing to OP treatment initiation was non-significant. The pathway to treatment initiation was mediated by patients' perception of their need, which was influenced by their self-reported BMD results. Baseline fracture risk factors, knowledge of OP, and perceived benefits of treatment-predicted patient-perceived need for treatment at follow-up and initiation of OP treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient perceptions were central factors in the path to initiation of OP pharmacotherapy. Interventions to facilitate accurate patient perceptions of BMD test results and OP risk status could prove helpful in improving OP treatment initiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23794044     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2430-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  37 in total

1.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Suzanne Morin; Angela M Cheung; Stephanie Atkinson; Jacques P Brown; Sidney Feldman; David A Hanley; Anthony Hodsman; Sophie A Jamal; Stephanie M Kaiser; Brent Kvern; Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A postfracture initiative to improve osteoporosis management in a community hospital in ontario.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Dorcas E Beaton; Victoria I M Elliot-Gibson; Earl R Bogoch; Jennifer Ingram
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  I M Rosenstock; V J Strecher; M H Becker
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1988

Review 4.  Sex and gender considerations in male patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Lauren E Lamont; Quang V Ton; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Colles fracture, spine fracture, and subsequent risk of hip fracture in men and women. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Haentjens; Philippe Autier; John Collins; Brigitte Velkeniers; Dirk Vanderschueren; Steven Boonen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Occurrence and incidence of the second hip fracture.

Authors:  H M Schrøder; K K Petersen; M Erlandsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The decision to accept treatment for osteoporosis following hip fracture: exploring the woman's perspective using a stage-of-change model.

Authors:  K F Mauck; M T Cuddihy; R T Trousdale; G R Pond; V S Pankratz; L J Melton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Measuring patient perceptions about osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Monique A M Gignac; Susan B Jaglal; Dorcas E Beaton; Gillian A Hawker
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-07-14

10.  Do patients perceive a link between a fragility fracture and osteoporosis?

Authors:  Lora Giangregorio; Alexandra Papaioannou; Lehana Thabane; Justin DeBeer; Ann Cranney; Lisa Dolovich; Anthony Adili; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Improving drug adherence in osteoporosis: an update on more recent studies.

Authors:  Ayesha Jaleel; Kenneth G Saag; Maria I Danila
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 5.346

2.  Addition of a fracture risk assessment to a coordinator's role improved treatment rates within 6 months of screening in a fragility fracture screening program.

Authors:  D E Beaton; M Vidmar; K B Pitzul; R Sujic; N K Rotondi; E R Bogoch; J E M Sale; R Jain; J Weldon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  [Co-management in geriatric traumatology].

Authors:  C Kammerlander; M Blauth; M Gosch; W Böcker
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Interdisciplinary management in geriatric trauma surgery : Results of a survey in Austria].

Authors:  C Stadler; M Gosch; T Roth; C Neuerburg; C Kammerlander
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Disparities in osteoporosis treatments.

Authors:  Z Liu; J Weaver; A de Papp; Z Li; J Martin; K Allen; S Hui; E A Imel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Patient perceptions of provider barriers to post-fracture secondary prevention.

Authors:  J E M Sale; E Bogoch; G Hawker; M Gignac; D Beaton; S Jaglal; L Frankel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Long-term experiences of pain after a fragility fracture.

Authors:  A Gheorghita; F Webster; S Thielke; J E M Sale
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Coding and prescription rates of osteoporosis are low among distal radius fracture patients in Japan.

Authors:  Natsumi Saka; Kyoko Nomura; Hoichi Amano; Kenichi Fujimoto; Yoshinobu Watanabe; Hirotaka Kawano; Shinichi Tanihara
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Low rates of osteoporosis treatment after hospitalization for hip fracture in Hawaii.

Authors:  E T Nguyen; T Posas-Mendoza; A M Siu; H J Ahn; S Y Choi; S Y Lim
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Anti-osteoporosis drug prescribing after hip fracture in the UK: 2000-2010.

Authors:  C Klop; D Gibson-Smith; P J M Elders; P M J Welsing; H G M Leufkens; N C Harvey; J W J Bijlsma; T-P van Staa; F de Vries
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.