Literature DB >> 20665012

A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: proportional rate control using relative disparity tau.

Joe Anderson1, Geoffrey P Bingham.   

Abstract

We provide a solution to a major problem in visually guided reaching. Research has shown that binocular vision plays an important role in the online visual guidance of reaching, but the visual information and strategy used to guide a reach remains unknown. We propose a new theory of visual guidance of reaching including a new information variable, tau(alpha) (relative disparity tau), and a novel control strategy that allows actors to guide their reach trajectories visually by maintaining a constant proportion between tau(alpha) and its rate of change. The dynamical model couples the information to the reaching movement to generate trajectories characteristic of human reaching. We tested the theory in two experiments in which participants reached under conditions of darkness to guide a visible point either on a sliding apparatus or on their finger to a point-light target in depth. Slider apparatus controlled for a simple mapping from visual to proprioceptive space. When reaching with their finger, participants were forced, by perturbation of visual information used for feedforward control, to use online control with only binocular disparity-based information for guidance. Statistical analyses of trajectories strongly supported the theory. Simulations of the model were compared statistically to actual reaching trajectories. The results supported the theory, showing that tau(alpha) provides a source of information for the control of visually guided reaching and that participants use this information in a proportional rate control strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20665012     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2361-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments.

Authors:  G P Bingham; A Bradley; M Bailey; R Vinner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Control of Trajectory Modifications in Target-Directed Reaching.

Authors:  J. R. Flanagan; D. J. Ostry; A. G. Feldman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  The Topology of Limb Deceleration in Prehension Tasks.

Authors:  F. T. J. M. Zaal; R. J. Bootsma
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda model) for motor control.

Authors:  A G Feldman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed.

Authors:  Geoffrey Bingham; Rachel Coats; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching.

Authors:  G P Bingham; C C Pagano
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis.

Authors:  J S Tittle; J T Todd; V J Perotti; J F Norman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension.

Authors:  P Servos; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual information about moving objects.

Authors:  J T Todd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Braking reaching movements: a test of the constant tau-dot strategy under different viewing conditions.

Authors:  Brian Hopkins; Andrew Churchill; Stefan Vogt; Louise Rönnqvist
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.328

View more
  7 in total

1.  Locomoting-to-reach: information variables and control strategies for nested actions.

Authors:  Joe Anderson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Information and control strategy to solve the degrees-of-freedom problem for nested locomotion-to-reach.

Authors:  Aaron J Fath; Brian S Marks; Winona Snapp-Childs; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Monocular guidance of reaches-to-grasp using visible support surface texture: data and model.

Authors:  Rachel A Herth; Xiaoye Michael Wang; Olivia Cherry; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Getting a grip: different actions and visual guidance of the thumb and finger in precision grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Miriam L Conway
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Viewing geometry determines the contribution of binocular vision to the online control of grasping.

Authors:  Bruce D Keefe; Simon J Watt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.