Literature DB >> 33388908

Monocular guidance of reaches-to-grasp using visible support surface texture: data and model.

Rachel A Herth1, Xiaoye Michael Wang1,2, Olivia Cherry1, Geoffrey P Bingham3.   

Abstract

We investigated monocular information for the continuous online guidance of reaches-to-grasp and present a dynamical control model thereof. We defined an information variable using optical texture projected from a support surface (i.e. a table) over which the participants reached-to-grasp target objects sitting on the table surface at different distances. Using either binocular or monocular vision in the dark, participants rapidly reached-to-grasp a phosphorescent square target object with visibly phosphorescent thumb and index finger. Targets were one of three sizes. The target either sat flat on the support surface or was suspended a few centimeters above the surface at a slant. The later condition perturbed the visible relation of the target to the support surface. The support surface was either invisible in the dark or covered with a visible phosphorescent checkerboard texture. Reach-to-grasp trajectories were recorded and Maximum Grasp Apertures (MGA), Movement Times (MT), Time of MGA (TMGA), and Time of Peak Velocities (TPV) were analyzed. These measures were selected as most indicative of the participant's certainty about the relation of hand to target object during the reaches. The findings were that, in general, especially monocular reaches were less certain (slower, earlier TMGA and TPV) than binocular reaches except with the target flat on the visible support surface where performance with monocular and binocular vision was equivalent. The hypothesized information was the difference in image width of optical texture (equivalent to density of optical texture) at the hand versus the target. A control dynamic equation was formulated representing proportional rate control of the reaches-to-grasp (akin to the model using binocular disparity formulated by Anderson and Bingham (Exp Brain Res 205: 291-306, 2010). Simulations were performed and presented using this model. Simulated performance was compared to actual performance and found to replicate it. To our knowledge, this is the first study of monocular information used for continuous online guidance of reaches-to-grasp, complete with a control dynamic model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Binocular vision; Monocular vision; Optical texture; Reaches-to-grasp; Visual guidance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33388908     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05989-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Accommodation, occlusion, and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: a comparison of actual versus virtual environments.

Authors:  G P Bingham; A Bradley; M Bailey; R Vinner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The role of binocular information in the 'on-line' control of prehension.

Authors:  Mark F Bradshaw; Kathleen M Elliott
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

3.  On-line versus off-line control of rapid aiming movements.

Authors:  J Blouin; C Bard; N Teasdale; M Fleury
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Binocular cues and the control of prehension.

Authors:  Mark F Bradshaw; Kathleen M Elliott; Simon J Watt; Paul B Hibbard; Ian R L Davies; P J Simpson
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004

5.  Locomoting-to-reach: information variables and control strategies for nested actions.

Authors:  Joe Anderson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Two eyes in action.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed.

Authors:  Geoffrey Bingham; Rachel Coats; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The dynamics of sensorimotor calibration in reaching-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Bingham; Mark A Mon-Williams
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching.

Authors:  G P Bingham; C C Pagano
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: proportional rate control using relative disparity tau.

Authors:  Joe Anderson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.