Literature DB >> 15136283

Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (lambda model) for motor control.

A G Feldman1.   

Abstract

The equilibrium control hypothesis (lambda model) is considered with special reference to the following concepts: (a) the length-force invariant characteristic (IC) of the muscle together with central and reflex systems subserving its activity; (b) the tonic stretch reflex threshold (lambda) as an independent measure of central commands descending to alpha and gamma motoneurons; (c) the equilibrium point, defined in terms of lambda, IC and static load characteristics, which is associated with the notion that posture and movement are controlled by a single mechanism; and (d) the muscle activation area (a reformulation of the "size principle")--the area of kinematic and command variables in which a rank-ordered recruitment of motor units takes place. The model is used for the interpretation of various motor phenomena, particularly electromyographic patterns. The stretch reflex in the lambda model has no mechanism to follow-up a certain muscle length prescribed by central commands. Rather, its task is to bring the system to an equilibrium, load-dependent position. Another currently popular version defines the equilibrium point concept in terms of alpha motoneuron activity alone (the alpha model). Although the model imitates (as does the lambda model) spring-like properties of motor performance, it nevertheless is inconsistent with a substantial data base on intact motor control. An analysis of alpha models, including their treatment of motor performance in deafferented animals, reveals that they suffer from grave shortcomings. It is concluded that parameterization of the stretch reflex is a basis for intact motor control. Muscle deafferentation impairs this graceful mechanism though it does not remove the possibility of movement.

Year:  1986        PMID: 15136283     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1986.10735369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  228 in total

1.  Effects of gravitational load on jaw movements in speech.

Authors:  D M Shiller; D J Ostry; P L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The case for an internal dynamics model versus equilibrium point control in human movement.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Theodore E Milner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Early postural adjustments in preparation to whole-body voluntary sway.

Authors:  Miriam Klous; Pavle Mikulic; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Referent configuration of the body: a global factor in the control of multiple skeletal muscles.

Authors:  Nancy St-Onge; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Discrete and cyclical units of action in a mixed target pair aiming task.

Authors:  John J Buchanan; Jin-H Park; Young U Ryu; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Movement speed effects on limb position drift.

Authors:  Liana E Brown; David A Rosenbaum; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Movement sway: changes in postural sway during voluntary shifts of the center of pressure.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; Sandra S Ferreira; Silvana A Wieczorek; Marcos Duarte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis.

Authors:  Ning Kang; Minoru Shinohara; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Independent control of joint stiffness in the framework of the equilibrium-point hypothesis.

Authors:  M L Latash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Adaptations to fatigue of a single digit violate the principle of superposition in a multi-finger static prehension task.

Authors:  Tarkeshwar Singh; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.