Literature DB >> 21931984

Locomoting-to-reach: information variables and control strategies for nested actions.

Joe Anderson1, Geoffrey P Bingham.   

Abstract

Locomoting-to-reach is a basic perception/action behavior that requires visual information for the control of both locomotion and reaching components. We investigated the visual information and the control strategies used to guide both the head and the hand on approach to a target in a locomotion-to-reach task. In this study, participants were required to locomote in the dark to a lit target in three different conditions: monocular vision/target with image size, binocular vision/target with image size, and binocular vision/point-light target (without image size). In task one, participants brought their eyes to the target. In task two, participants brought their outstretched hand to the target. Movement trajectories for both tasks were analyzed. Results show that participants were significantly more accurate when binocular information was present. In both tasks, participants were found to use a proportional rate control strategy rather than a constant τ strategy. In the walk-to-reach task, they used monocular and/or binocular τ information to guide the head and then switched to using relative disparity τ to guide the hand to final target acquisition, switching when the hand centric τ became less than the head centric τ. Dynamical models of the information and control strategies were used to perform simulations that were found to fit the data well. The conclusion is that proportional rate control is used sequentially with head centric, then hand-centric τ-based information, using at each moment the τ with the smallest value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21931984     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2865-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Contributions of gait and trunk movements to prehension: perspectives from world- and body-centered coordinates.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C P Bertram
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Control of Trajectory Modifications in Target-Directed Reaching.

Authors:  J. R. Flanagan; D. J. Ostry; A. G. Feldman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Tau as a potential control variable for visually guided braking.

Authors:  Paul B Rock; Mike G Harris
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Coordination of locomotion and prehension.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  A test of the tau-dot hypothesis of braking control in the real world.

Authors:  Paul B Rock; Mike G Harris; Tim Yates
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Natural prehension in trials without haptic feedback but only when calibration is allowed.

Authors:  Geoffrey Bingham; Rachel Coats; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion.

Authors:  J F Larish; J M Flach
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Visual information about moving objects.

Authors:  J T Todd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: proportional rate control using relative disparity tau.

Authors:  Joe Anderson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Reaching while walking: reaching distance costs more than walking distance.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Information and control strategy to solve the degrees-of-freedom problem for nested locomotion-to-reach.

Authors:  Aaron J Fath; Brian S Marks; Winona Snapp-Childs; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Monocular guidance of reaches-to-grasp using visible support surface texture: data and model.

Authors:  Rachel A Herth; Xiaoye Michael Wang; Olivia Cherry; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.