Literature DB >> 22899313

Getting a grip: different actions and visual guidance of the thumb and finger in precision grasping.

Dean R Melmoth1, Simon Grant.   

Abstract

We manipulated the visual information available for grasping to examine what is visually guided when subjects get a precision grip on a common class of object (upright cylinders). In Experiment 1, objects (2 sizes) were placed at different eccentricities to vary the relative proximity to the participant's (n = 6) body of their thumb and finger contact positions in the final grip orientations, with vision available throughout or only for movement programming. Thumb trajectories were straighter and less variable than finger paths, and the thumb normally made initial contact with the objects at a relatively invariant landing site, but consistent thumb first-contacts were disrupted without visual guidance. Finger deviations were more affected by the object's properties and increased when vision was unavailable after movement onset. In Experiment 2, participants (n = 12) grasped 'glow-in-the-dark' objects wearing different luminous gloves in which the whole hand was visible or the thumb or the index finger was selectively occluded. Grip closure times were prolonged and thumb first-contacts disrupted when subjects could not see their thumb, whereas occluding the finger resulted in wider grips at contact because this digit remained distant from the object. Results were together consistent with visual feedback guiding the thumb in the period just prior to contacting the object, with the finger more involved in opening the grip and avoiding collision with the opposite contact surface. As people can overtly fixate only one object contact point at a time, we suggest that selecting one digit for online guidance represents an optimal strategy for initial grip placement. Other grasping tasks, in which the finger appears to be used for this purpose, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22899313     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3214-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension.

Authors:  A Churchill; B Hopkins; L Rönnqvist; S Vogt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  On the hand transport component of prehensile movements.

Authors:  P Haggard; A Wing
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Effects of object shape and visual feedback on hand configuration during grasping.

Authors:  Luis F Schettino; Sergei V Adamovich; Howard Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Robert S Mark; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Moving effortlessly in three dimensions: does Donders' law apply to arm movement?

Authors:  J F Soechting; C A Buneo; U Herrmann; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension.

Authors:  P Servos; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A solution to the online guidance problem for targeted reaches: proportional rate control using relative disparity tau.

Authors:  Joe Anderson; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Development of human precision grip. I: Basic coordination of force.

Authors:  H Forssberg; A C Eliasson; H Kinoshita; R S Johansson; G Westling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of visual uncertainty on grasping movements.

Authors:  Erik J Schlicht; Paul R Schrater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The visibility of contact points influences grasping movements.

Authors:  Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Age- and stereovision-dependent eye-hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Catherine Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Miriam L Conway; John J Sloper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Visual field preferences of object analysis for grasping with one hand.

Authors:  Ada Le; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Miriam L Conway
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Fixation Biases towards the Index Finger in Almost-Natural Grasping.

Authors:  Dimitris Voudouris; Jeroen B J Smeets; Eli Brenner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predicting the duration of reach-to-grasp movements to objects with asymmetric contact surfaces.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; Raymond J Holt; Geoffrey P Bingham; Mark A Mon-Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  How removing visual information affects grasping movements.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B Smeets; Robert Volcic; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.