Literature DB >> 8013579

Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension.

P Servos1, M A Goodale.   

Abstract

The contribution of binocular visual feedback to the kinematics of human prehension was studied in two related experiments. In both experiments, the field of view of each eye was independently controlled by means of goggles fitted with liquid-crystal shutters. While wearing these goggles, which permitted either a binocular or a monocular view of the world, subjects were required to reach out and grasp a target object, which varied in size and position from trial to trial. In experiment 1, two viewing conditions were used. In one condition, binocular vision was available throughout the entire trial; in the second condition, the initial binocular view was replaced by a monocular view after the reaching movement had been initiated. When only monocular feedback was available, subjects showed a prolonged deceleration phase, although the time they spent in contact with the object was the same in both conditions. In experiment 2, monocular vision was available throughout a given trial in one condition and was replaced by binocular vision upon movement initiation in the second condition. Subjects in this experiment also displayed a prolonged deceleration phase in the monocular feedback condition relative to their performance in the binocular feedback condition. Unlike experiment 1, however, allowing only monocular feedback resulted in an increase in the amount of time subjects spent in contact with the object. Moreover, the object contact phases under the two conditions of experiment 2 were much longer than those observed in experiment 1, in which subjects received initial binocular views of the object.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8013579     DOI: 10.1007/bf00229116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  14 in total

1.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vertical disparities and perception of three-dimensional shape.

Authors:  B G Cumming; E B Johnston; A J Parker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Vertical disparity, egocentric distance and stereoscopic depth constancy: a new interpretation.

Authors:  P O Bishop
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1989-09-22

4.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement.

Authors:  M A Goodale; D Pelisson; C Prablanc
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Apr 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Vertical disparities, differential perspective and binocular stereopsis.

Authors:  B J Rogers; M F Bradshaw
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Binocular distance perception.

Authors:  J M Foley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The role of the vertical dimension in stereoscopic vision.

Authors:  H C Longuet-Higgins
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Visual judgements and misjudgements in cricket, and the art of flight.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis.

Authors:  P Servos; M A Goodale; L S Jakobson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  28 in total

1.  Risk factors for strabismus in children born before 32 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  P M Pennefather; M P Clarke; N P Strong; D G Cottrell; J Dutton; W Tin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  EEG correlates of coordinate processing during intermanual transfer.

Authors:  Regine K Lange; Ben Godde; Christoph Braun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Importance of binocular vision in foot placement accuracy when stepping onto a floor-based target during gait initiation.

Authors:  Graham J Chapman; Andy Scally; John G Buckley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Two eyes in action.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Role of vision in aperture closure control during reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Martin Lemay; Linda M Squire; Yury P Shimansky; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visual and somatosensory information about object shape control manipulative fingertip forces.

Authors:  P Jenmalm; R S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Stereopsis contributes to the predictive control of grip forces during prehension.

Authors:  Corey A Mroczkowski; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.

Authors:  Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.