Literature DB >> 12409563

Minimizing radiation-induced skin injury in interventional radiology procedures.

Donald L Miller1, Stephen Balter, Patrick T Noonan, Jeffrey D Georgia.   

Abstract

Skin injury is a deterministic effect of radiation. Once a threshold dose has been exceeded, the severity of the radiation effect at any point on the skin increases with increasing dose. Peak skin dose is defined as the highest dose delivered to any portion of the patient's skin. Reducing peak skin dose can reduce the likelihood and type of skin injury. Unfortunately, peak skin dose is difficult to measure in real time, and most currently available fluoroscopic systems do not provide the operator with sufficient information to minimize skin dose. Measures that reduce total radiation dose will reduce peak skin dose, as well as dose to the operator and assistants. These measures include minimizing fluoroscopy time, the number of images obtained, and dose by controlling technical factors. Specific techniques-dose spreading and collimation-reduce both peak skin dose and the size of skin area subjected to peak skin dose. For optimum effect, real-time knowledge of skin-dose distribution is invaluable. A trained operator using well-maintained state-of-the art equipment can minimize peak skin dose in all fluoroscopically guided procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12409563     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2252011414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  Radiation dose in vertebroplasty.

Authors:  A Mehdizade; K O Lovblad; K E Wilhelm; T Somon; S G Wetzel; A D Kelekis; H Yilmaz; G Abdo; J B Martin; J M Viera; D A Rüfenacht
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2004-02-14       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  A comparison of radiation exposure between diagnostic CTA and DSA examinations of cerebral and cervicocerebral vessels.

Authors:  A-L Manninen; J-M Isokangas; A Karttunen; T Siniluoto; M T Nieminen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Overlap of radiation field and radiation field shape in cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Takayoshi Nakajima; Toshio Take; Shinichiro Sumi; Hideki Ishida; Yasuo Nakazawa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-08-26

4.  Radiation exposure of operator performing interventional procedures using a flat panel angiography system: evaluation with photoluminescence glass dosimeters.

Authors:  Yoshinori Funama; Nozomu Nagasue; Kazuo Awai; Ichiro Sakamoto; Kiyotaka Kakei; Masamichi Shimamura; Yasuyuki Yamashita; Masataka Uetani
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Radiation risk from fluoroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J P Chitnavis; A Karthikesalingam; A Karthikesaligam; A Macdonald; C Brown
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Effect of physician training on fluoroscopy time during ERCP.

Authors:  Lance T Uradomo; Mark E Lustberg; Peter E Darwin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Reference air kerma and kerma-area product as estimators of peak skin dose for fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Authors:  Deukwoo Kwon; Mark P Little; Donald L Miller
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Use of transabdominal ultrasound-guided transjugular portal vein puncture on radiation dose in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt formation.

Authors:  Aniket N Tavare; Andrew Wigham; Anastasia Hadjivassilou; Abdulrahman Alvi; Anthie Papadopoulou; Antony Goode; Nick Woodward; David Patch; Dominic Yu; Neil Davies
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

9.  Radiation dose during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): upgrade of an angiographic system from standard to Eco mode.

Authors:  Maria Antonella Ruffino; Marco Fronda; Andrea Discalzi; Paola Isoardi; Laura Bergamasco; Roberto Ropolo; Dorico Righi; Paolo Fonio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Radiation dose to the brain and subsequent risk of developing brain tumors in pediatric patients undergoing interventional neuroradiology procedures.

Authors:  I Thierry-Chef; S L Simon; C E Land; D L Miller
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.