Literature DB >> 23299012

Identifying counseling needs of nulliparous adolescent intrauterine contraceptive users: a qualitative approach.

Margot K Brown1, Colette Auerswald, Stephen L Eyre, Julianna Deardorff, Christine Dehlendorf.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the intrauterine contraception (IUC) adoption process among nulliparous adolescents and to identify the role of the medical provider in this trajectory.
METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews with a clinic-based sample of 20 nulliparous adolescents (aged 15-24 years) with a history of IUC use. Interviews were analyzed using modified grounded theory and cross-case analysis to reveal a process model for IUC adoption, with a focus on the role of the medical provider.
RESULTS: The model includes the following stages: first awareness, initial reaction, information gathering, adoption, and adjustment and reassessment. It is influenced by personal preferences and experiences, friends, family, sexual partner(s), and medical providers. Interactions with medical providers that study participants found helpful in navigating the adoption process included the use of visuals; tailored counseling to address specific contraceptive needs; assurance that IUC discontinuation was an option; information on a wide range of side effects; medical provider self-disclosure regarding use of IUC; and addressing and validating concerns, both before and after IUC insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous adolescents in this study described a complex IUC adoption process in which the medical provider plays a substantial supportive role. Findings from this study may be used to counsel and support future nulliparous adolescents regarding IUC use.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23299012      PMCID: PMC3580020          DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adolesc Health        ISSN: 1054-139X            Impact factor:   5.012


  32 in total

Review 1.  Intrauterine devices and adolescents.

Authors:  Melanie A Gold; Lisa M Johnson
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.927

2.  Influence of IUD perceptions on method discontinuation.

Authors:  Abdulrazak H Alnakash
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Adolescent experiences with the vaginal ring.

Authors:  Laura B Epstein; Karen Sokal-Gutierrez; Susan L Ivey; Tina Raine; Colette Auerswald
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  Revisiting the intrauterine contraceptive device in adolescents.

Authors:  Alina Toma; Mary Anne Jamieson
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  Health care providers' knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Kira Levy; Rachel Ruskin; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices.

Authors:  Nancy L Stanwood; Karen A Bradley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device.

Authors:  Amy K Whitaker; Lisa M Johnson; Bryna Harwood; Laurel Chiappetta; Mitchell D Creinin; Melanie A Gold
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 8.  Sexuality in the child, teen, and young adult: concepts for the clinician.

Authors:  Helena Fonseca; Donald E Greydanus
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.907

9.  Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Maya Blum; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Philip D Darney; J Joseph Speidel; Michael Policar; Eleanor A Drey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Kathryn Kost; Susheela Singh; Barbara Vaughan; James Trussell; Akinrinola Bankole
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  12 in total

1.  A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Contraceptive Choice among Adolescent School-Based Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Aletha Y Akers; Kym R Ahrens
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.814

2.  Birth Control Connect: A randomized trial of an online group to disseminate contraceptive information.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Edith Fox; Anjana E Sharma; Jingwen Zhang; Sijia Yang; Damon Centola
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Adolescent Experiences With Intrauterine Devices: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth O Schmidt; Aimee James; K Michele Curran; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 5.012

4.  "I Think Parents Shouldn't Be Too Pushy": A Qualitative Exploration of Parent and Youth Perspectives of Youth Decision-Making Involvement in Starting Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Ettya R Fremont; Nathalie Slick; Steven M Willi; Victoria A Miller
Journal:  Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care       Date:  2021-08-27

5.  Trends in Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Use in Adolescents and Young Adults: New Estimates Accounting for Sexual Experience.

Authors:  Karen Pazol; Kimberly Daniels; Lisa Romero; Lee Warner; Wanda Barfield
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.012

6.  Urban Adolescents' and Young Adults' Decision-Making Process around Selection of Intrauterine Contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Marisa Felsher; Faye Korich; Amanda M Jacobs
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.814

7.  Youth-Friendly Family Planning Services for Young People: A Systematic Review Update.

Authors:  Anna W Brittain; Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno; Karen Pazol; Lauren B Zapata; Emily Decker; Julia M Rollison; Nikita M Malcolm; Lisa M Romero; Emilia H Koumans
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Client Preferences for Contraceptive Counseling: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Edith Fox; Arlene Reyna; Nikita M Malcolm; Rachel B Rosmarin; Lauren B Zapata; Brittni N Frederiksen; Susan B Moskosky; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Is Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Use Increasing? Assessing Trends Among U.S. College Women, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Rachel G Logan; Erika L Thompson; Cheryl A Vamos; Stacey B Griner; Coralia Vázquez-Otero; Ellen M Daley
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-11

10.  Shared Decision Aids: Increasing Patient Acceptance of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.

Authors:  Tracy P George; Claire DeCristofaro; Bonnie P Dumas; Pamela F Murphy
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.