Literature DB >> 22270272

Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.

Cynthia C Harper1, J Joseph Speidel, Eleanor A Drey, James Trussell, Maya Blum, Philip D Darney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The copper intrauterine device (IUD) is the most effective emergency contraceptive available but is largely ignored in clinical practice. We examined clinicians' recommendations of the copper IUD for emergency contraception in a setting with few cost obstacles.
METHODS: We conducted a survey among clinicians (n=1,246; response rate 65%) in a California State family planning program, where U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptives are available at no cost to low-income women. We used multivariable logistic regression to measure the association of intrauterine contraceptive training and evidence-based knowledge with having recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception.
RESULTS: The large majority of clinicians (85%) never recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception, and most (93%) required two or more visits for an IUD insertion. Multivariable analyses showed insertion skills were associated with having recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception, but the most significant factor was evidence-based knowledge of patient selection for IUD use. Clinicians who viewed a wide range of patients as IUD candidates were twice as likely to have recommended the copper IUD for emergency contraception. Although more than 93% of obstetrician-gynecologists were skilled in inserting the copper IUD, they were no more likely to have recommended it for emergency contraception than other physicians or advance practice clinicians.
CONCLUSION: Recommendation of the copper IUD for emergency contraception is rare, despite its high efficacy and long-lasting contraceptive benefits. Recommendation would require clinic flow and scheduling adjustments to allow same-day IUD insertions. Patient-centered and high-quality care for emergency contraception should include a discussion of the most effective method. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22270272      PMCID: PMC3266549          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182429e0d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  23 in total

1.  Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.

Authors:  Nancy L Stanwood; Joanne M Garrett; Thomas R Konrad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  IUD--related uterine perforation: an epidemiologic analysis of a rare event using an international dataset.

Authors:  I Chi; P J Feldblum; S M Rogers
Journal:  Contracept Deliv Syst       Date:  1984-04

3.  IUD-related knowledge, attitudes and practices among Navajo Area Indian Health Service providers.

Authors:  Eve Espey; Tony Ogburn; David Espey; Virgil Etsitty
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

4.  Low dose mifepristone and two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a WHO multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Helena von Hertzen; Gilda Piaggio; Juhong Ding; Junling Chen; Si Song; György Bártfai; Ernest Ng; Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Amindavaa Oyunbileg; Shangchun Wu; Weiyu Cheng; Frank Lüdicke; Alenka Pretnar-Darovec; Rosemary Kirkman; Suneeta Mittal; Archil Khomassuridze; Dan Apter; Alexandre Peregoudov
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-07       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A survey of women obtaining emergency contraception: are they interested in using the copper IUD?

Authors:  David K Turok; Shawn E Gurtcheff; Erin Handley; Sara E Simonsen; Christina Sok; Riana North; Caren Frost; Patricia A Murphy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Renewed interest in intrauterine contraception in the United States: evidence and explanation.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Lawrence B Finer; Eve Espey
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Kirsten M J Thompson; J Joseph Speidel; Vicki Saporta; Norma Jo Waxman; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  What influences young women to choose between the emergency contraceptive pill and an intrauterine device? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Preeti Bharadwaj; Jennifer C Saxton; Susan N Mann; Eva M A Jungmann; Judith M Stephenson
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Emergency contraception with Multiload Cu-375 SL IUD: a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  L Zhou; B Xiao
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective.

Authors:  T M Farley; M J Rosenberg; P J Rowe; J H Chen; O Meirik
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-03-28       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Emergency contraception review: evidence-based recommendations for clinicians.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Elizabeth G Raymond; Elizabeth Westley; James Trussell
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Improving LARC Access for Urban Adolescents and Young Adults in the Pediatric Primary Care Setting.

Authors:  Uche F Onyewuchi; Kathy Tomaszewski; Krishna K Upadhya; Priya S Gupta; Natalie Whaley; Anne E Burke; Maria E Trent
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 1.168

3.  The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know?

Authors:  Suzan R Goodman; Alison M El Ayadi; Corinne H Rocca; Julia E Kohn; Courtney E Benedict; Jessica R Dieseldorff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Emergency contraception: A multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices.

Authors:  Pelin Batur; Kelly Cleland; Megan McNamara; Justine Wu; Sarah Pickle
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  David K Turok; Jessica N Sanders; Ivana S Thompson; Pamela A Royer; Jennifer Eggebroten; Lori M Gawron
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 6.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.

Authors:  Kelly Cleland; Haoping Zhu; Norman Goldstuck; Linan Cheng; James Trussell
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 7.  Emerging options for emergency contraception.

Authors:  Atsuko Koyama; Laura Hagopian; Judith Linden
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2013-02-18

8.  The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception and beyond: a systematic review update.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Tik Shan Cheung
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-21

9.  The potential for intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate as a self-bridging emergency contraceptive.

Authors:  Robyn Schickler; Diana Crabtree-Sokol; Jasmine Patel; Nicole Bender; Anita L Nelson; Brian T Nguyen
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-12-03

Review 10.  State of emergency contraception in the U.S., 2018.

Authors:  Kristin O Haeger; Jacqueline Lamme; Kelly Cleland
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2018-09-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.