Literature DB >> 21884386

Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007.

Christine Dehlendorf1, Diana Greene Foster, Heike Thiel de Bocanegra, Claire Brindis, Mary Bradsberry, Philip Darney.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The extent to which racial and ethnic differences in method choice are associated with financial barriers is unclear. Understanding these associations may provide insight into how to address racial and ethnic disparities in unintended pregnancy.
METHODS: Claims data from the California Family PACT program, which provides free family planning services to low-income residents, were used to determine the proportions of women receiving each type of contraceptive method in 2001-2007. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associations between women's race and ethnicity and the primary contraceptive method they received in 2007.
RESULTS: Compared with white women, blacks and Latinas were less likely to receive oral contraceptives (odds ratios, 0.4 and 0.6, respectively) and the contraceptive ring (0.7 and 0.5), and more likely to receive the injectable (1.6 and 1.4) and the patch (1.6 and 2.3). Black women were less likely than whites to receive the IUD (0.5), but more likely to receive barrier methods and emergency contraceptive pills (2.6); associations were similar, though weaker, for Latinas. Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of effective methods declined between 2001 and 2005, largely because receipt of the patch (which was introduced in 2002) was higher among minority than white women.
CONCLUSION: Although Family PACT eliminates financial barriers to method choice, the methods women received differed substantially by race and ethnicity in this low-income population. The reduction in racial and ethnic disparities following introduction of the patch suggests that methods with novel characteristics may increase acceptability of contraceptives among minority women.
Copyright © 2011 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884386      PMCID: PMC3412526          DOI: 10.1363/4318111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  32 in total

1.  Perceptions of hormonal contraceptive safety and side effects among low-income Latina and non-Latina women.

Authors:  S Guendelman; C Denny; J Mauldon; C Chetkovich
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-12

2.  The pill at 40--a new look at a familiar method. Black women and the pill.

Authors:  D Roberts
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

Review 3.  Paved with good intentions: do public health and human service providers contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in health?

Authors:  Michelle van Ryn; Steven S Fu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California.

Authors:  Alexandra Minna Stern
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Urban adolescent females' views on the implant and contraceptive decision-making: a double paradox.

Authors:  H Kuiper; S Miller; E Martinez; L Loeb; P Darney
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  Patient self-reports in pharmacoeconomic studies. Their use and impact on study validity.

Authors:  C Evans; B Crawford
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002.

Authors:  William D Mosher; Gladys M Martinez; Anjani Chandra; Joyce C Abma; Stephanie J Willson
Journal:  Adv Data       Date:  2004-12-10

8.  Access to coronary artery bypass surgery by race/ethnicity and gender among patients who are appropriate for surgery.

Authors:  E L Hannan; M van Ryn; J Burke; D Stone; D Kumar; D Arani; W Pierce; S Rafii; T A Sanborn; S Sharma; J Slater; B A DeBuono
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Concerns about contraceptive side effects among young Latinas: a focus-group approach.

Authors:  Melissa L Gilliam; Meredith Warden; Chava Goldstein; Beatriz Tapia
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  28 in total

1.  Predictors of contraceptive switching and discontinuation within the first 6 months of use among Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake study participants.

Authors:  Rebecca G Simmons; Jessica N Sanders; Claudia Geist; Lori Gawron; Kyl Myers; David K Turok
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Immediate post-abortion insertion of intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) in a diverse urban population.

Authors:  DeShawn Taylor; Shannon Connolly; Sue Ann Ingles; Carey Watson; Penina Segall-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

3.  From Epidemiology to Action: The Case for Addressing Social Determinants of Health to End HIV in the Southern United States.

Authors:  William L Jeffries; Kirk D Henny
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2019-10

4.  Household income and contraceptive methods among female youth: a cross-sectional study using the Canadian Community Health Survey (2009-2010 and 2013-2014).

Authors:  Elizabeth Nethery; Laura Schummers; K Suzanne Maginley; Sheila Dunn; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2019-11-04

5.  Types of oral contraceptives and breast cancer survival among women enrolled in Medicaid: A competing-risk model.

Authors:  Marsha E Samson; Swann Arp Adams; Caroline M Mulatya; Jiajia Zhang; Charles L Bennett; James Hebert; Susan E Steck
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Pull and pray or extra protection? Contraceptive strategies involving withdrawal among US adult women.

Authors:  Rachel K Jones; Laura D Lindberg; Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Trends in contraceptive use among women with human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  Mengyang Sun; Jeffrey F Peipert; Qiuhong Zhao; Tracey E Wilson; Kathleen M Weber; Lorraine Sanchez-Keeland; Gypsyamber DʼSouza; Mary Young; D Heather Watts; Marla J Keller; Deborah Cohan; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Women's experiences after Planned Parenthood's exclusion from a family planning program in Texas.

Authors:  C Junda Woo; Hasanat Alamgir; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  Risk factors for endometrial cancer in black and white women: a pooled analysis from the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium (E2C2).

Authors:  Michele L Cote; Tala Alhajj; Julie J Ruterbusch; Leslie Bernstein; Louise A Brinton; William J Blot; Chu Chen; Margery Gass; Sarah Gaussoin; Brian Henderson; Eunjung Lee; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Laurence N Kolonel; Andrew Kaunitz; Xiaolin Liang; Wanda K Nicholson; Amy B Park; Stacey Petruzella; Timothy R Rebbeck; V Wendy Setiawan; Lisa B Signorello; Michael S Simon; Noel S Weiss; Nicolas Wentzensen; Hannah P Yang; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Sara H Olson
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: an investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Kira Levy; Alexandra M Minnis; Maureen Lahiff; Julie Schmittdiel; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-12-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.