Literature DB >> 18692611

Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device.

Amy K Whitaker1, Lisa M Johnson, Bryna Harwood, Laurel Chiappetta, Mitchell D Creinin, Melanie A Gold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess adolescent (aged 14-18 years) and young adult (aged 19-24 years) women's knowledge of and attitudes toward intrauterine devices (IUDs) before and after a brief educational intervention. STUDY
DESIGN: We administered a 43-item survey to 144 women aged 14-24 years, with half in each age category. The survey assessed knowledge of and attitudes toward IUDs, and incorporated a 3-min educational intervention about IUDs. Predictors for knowledge of and attitudes toward the IUD were examined using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Forty percent of participants had heard of the IUD. Having ever heard of the IUD was associated with age >18 years [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=5.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=2.1-15.7], a higher level of maternal education (adjusted OR=4.5; 95% CI=1.5-13.3) and a history of voluntary sexual intercourse (adjusted OR=4.9; 95% CI=1.0-23.5). Of those who had heard of the IUD previously, 37.5% reported a positive attitude toward the IUD before the intervention. After the educational intervention, 53.5% of all participants reported a positive attitude toward the IUD, with both adolescent and young adult women having similarly positive attitudes (51.4% vs. 55.6%, p=.62). This positive attitude was associated only with a history of voluntary sexual intercourse (adjusted OR=5.2; 95% CI=1.3-21.1). The characteristics of the IUD that the participants strongly liked and disliked were rated similarly by the two age groups. However, more adolescent women considered the privacy of the IUD and the ability to use the copper IUD for 10 years as positive characteristics.
CONCLUSION: Most young women were unaware of IUDs but were likely to think positively about IUDs after being educated about them. Demographic and reproductive health history did not predict attitude; thus, all young women should be offered education about IUDs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18692611     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  38 in total

1.  Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; J Joseph Speidel; Eleanor A Drey; James Trussell; Maya Blum; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project.

Authors:  Renee Mestad; Gina Secura; Jenifer E Allsworth; Tessa Madden; Qiuhong Zhao; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Diana Greene Foster; Heike Thiel de Bocanegra; Claire Brindis; Mary Bradsberry; Philip Darney
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-08-01

4.  Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: national survey of nurse practitioners.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Laura Stratton; Tina R Raine; Kirsten Thompson; Jillian T Henderson; Maya Blum; Debbie Postlethwaite; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Why Didn't You Text Me? Poststudy Trends From the DepoText Trial.

Authors:  Cara R Muñoz Buchanan; Kathy Tomaszewski; Shang-En Chung; Krishna K Upadhya; Alexandra Ramsey; Maria E Trent
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 1.168

6.  Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City.

Authors:  Julia Potter; Susan E Rubin; Peter Sherman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Contraceptive Choice among Adolescent School-Based Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Aletha Y Akers; Kym R Ahrens
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.814

8.  Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists.

Authors:  Cynthia C Harper; Jillian T Henderson; Tina R Raine; Suzan Goodman; Philip D Darney; Kirsten M Thompson; Christine Dehlendorf; J Joseph Speidel
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Megan L Kavanaugh; Lori Frohwirth; Jenna Jerman; Ronna Popkin; Kathleen Ethier
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 1.814

10.  Knowledge and Acceptability of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescent Women Receiving School-Based Primary Care Services.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Kym R Ahrens; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Wren L Haaland; Anne-Marie Amies Oelschlager; Sarah Prager
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.