Literature DB >> 28573308

Serial practice impairs motor skill consolidation.

Kristin-Marie Neville1, Maxime Trempe2.   

Abstract

Recent reports have revealed that motor skill learning is impaired if two skills are practiced one after the other, that is before the first skill has had the time to become consolidated. This suggests that motor skills should be practiced in isolation from one another to minimize interference. At the moment, little is known about the effect of practice schedules high in contextual interference on motor skill consolidation. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether a serial practice schedule impairs motor skill consolidation. Participants had to learn two distinct sequences of finger movements (A and B) under either a blocked practice schedule or a serial practice schedule before being retested the following day. A control group also practiced Sequence A only. Our results revealed that a blocked practice schedule led to no interference between the sequences, whereas a serial practice schedule impaired the consolidation of Sequence B. In Experiment 2, we investigated the origin of the interference caused by a serial practice schedule by replacing the physical practice of Sequence A with either the observation of a model performing Sequence A or by asking participants to produce random finger movements. Our results revealed that both tasks interfered with the consolidation of Sequence B. Thus, we suggest that a serial practice schedule impairs motor skill consolidation through a conflict in the brain networks involved in the acquisition of the cognitive representation of the sequence and its execution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consolidation; Contextual interference; Finger sequence task; Observational learning; Offline learning; Serial practice

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28573308     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4992-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  57 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Plasticity and primary motor cortex.

Authors:  J N Sanes; J P Donoghue
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 3.  Memory--a century of consolidation.

Authors:  J L McGaugh
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Distinct motor plans form and retrieve distinct motor memories for physically identical movements.

Authors:  Masaya Hirashima; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Random and blocked practice of movement sequences: differential effects on response structure and movement speed.

Authors:  Heather Wilde; Curt Magnuson; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  The interference effects of non-rotated versus counter-rotated trials in visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Mark R Hinder; Laura Walk; Daniel G Woolley; Stephan Riek; Richard G Carson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Adaptation to visuomotor transformations: consolidation, interference, and forgetting.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Claude Ghez; M Felice Ghilardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Sleep-dependent memory consolidation and reconsolidation.

Authors:  Robert Stickgold; Matthew P Walker
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Interference to consolidation phase gains in learning a novel movement sequence by handwriting: dependence on laterality and the level of experience with the written sequence.

Authors:  Meirav Balas; Shai Netser; Nir Giladi; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  The stuff that motor chunks are made of: Spatial instead of motor representations?

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Eduard C Groen; David L Wright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  A tale of too many tasks: task fragmentation in motor learning and a call for model task paradigms.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Aimee D Tomlinson; Rakshith Lokesh; Tzu-Hsiang Lin; Priya Patel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.