Literature DB >> 33909111

Assessing and defining explicit processes in visuomotor adaptation.

S Heirani Moghaddam1, R Chua2, E K Cressman3.   

Abstract

The Process Dissociation Procedure (PDP) and Verbal Report Framework (VRF) reveal that both explicit (conscious) and implicit (unconscious) processes contribute to visuomotor adaptation. We looked to determine whether these two assessment methods establish similar processes underlying visuomotor adaptation by comparing the magnitude of explicit and implicit adaptation over time between the two assessments and to post-experiment assessments of awareness of the visuomotor distortion. Three groups of participants (PDP, VRF, VRF No-Cursor) completed three blocks of reach training in a virtual environment with a cursor rotated 40° clockwise relative to hand motion. Explicit and implicit adaptations were assessed immediately following each block, and again 5 min later. The VRF No-Cursor group completed the same assessment trials as the VRF group, but no visual feedback was presented during explicit and implicit assessment. Finally, participants completed a post-experiment questionnaire and a drawing task to assess their awareness of the visuomotor rotation and changes in reaches at the end of the experiment, respectively. We found that all groups adapted their reaches to the rotation. Averaged across participants, the magnitude and retention of explicit and implicit adaptations were similar between the PDP group and VRF group, with the VRF group demonstrating greater implicit adaptation than the VRF No-Cursor group. Furthermore, the magnitude of explicit adaptation established in the VRF group was not related to participant's post-experiment awareness of the visuomotor distortion nor how they had changed their reaches, as observed in the PDP group and VRF No-Cursor group. Together, these results indicate that, explicit adaptation established via typical VRF methods does not reflect one's awareness of the visuomotor distortion at the end of the experiment, and hence the established processes underlying visuomotor adaptation are dependent on method of assessment (i.e., PDP versus VRF).
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Explicit adaptation; Implicit adaptation; Process dissociation procedure; Verbal report framework; Visuomotor adaptation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33909111     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06109-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  20 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture.

Authors:  Pierre Baraduc; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visuomotor adaptation in normal aging.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Sereniti Young; José L Contreras-Vidal
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 4.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Dissociable effects of the implicit and explicit memory systems on learning control of reaching.

Authors:  Eun Jung Hwang; Maurice A Smith; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Sensory recalibration of hand position following visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Erin K Cressman; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Bryan L Benson; Joaquin A Anguera; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Using gaze behavior to parcellate the explicit and implicit contributions to visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Mohammed Albaghdadi; J Randall Flanagan; Jason P Gallivan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The explicit/implicit distinction in studies of visuomotor learning: Conceptual and methodological pitfalls.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improved proprioception does not benefit visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Amelia Decarie; Erin K Cressman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.