Literature DB >> 15111282

Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: a causal analysis.

W R Carroll1, A Bandura.   

Abstract

This experiment tested the hypothesis that the number of model presentations and verbal coding of modeled actions affect reproduction accuracy through their effect on cognitive representation. Subjects viewed a complex action pattern either two or eight times with or without verbal coding to highlight the dynamic structure of the component actions and their temporal sequencing. They then received, in order, a recognition test and a pictorial-arrangement test to assess the accuracy of their cognitive representations of the modeled actions. Subsequently, all subjects were tested for their ability to reproduce the action pattern from memory. Results showed that increased exposure to modeled actions enhanced the accuracy of both the cognitive representation and the behavioral reproduction. Verbal coding also increased cognitive and reproduction accuracy, but only when combined with multiple opportunities to observe the modeled actions. A causal analysis confirmed that the effects of multiple exposures and verbal coding were entirely mediated by changes produced in the accuracy of cognitive representation.

Year:  1990        PMID: 15111282     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1990.10735503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  13 in total

1.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Absence of after-effects for observers after watching a visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Observational practice benefits are limited to perceptual improvements in the acquisition of a novel coordination skill.

Authors:  Dana Maslovat; Nicola J Hodges; Olav E Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Consolidating behavioral and neurophysiologic findings to explain the influence of contextual interference during motor sequence learning.

Authors:  David Wright; Willem Verwey; John Buchanen; Jing Chen; Joohyun Rhee; Maarten Immink
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

5.  What we think we learn from watching others: the moderating role of ability on perceptions of learning from observation.

Authors:  Nicola J Hodges; Thomas Coppola
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-21

6.  Mixed observation favors motor learning through better estimation of the model's performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning.

Authors:  Emily S Cross; David J M Kraemer; Antonia F de C Hamilton; William M Kelley; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Comparative effectiveness of videotape and handout mode of instructions for teaching exercises: skill retention in normal children.

Authors:  Garima Gupta; Stuti Sehgal
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.054

9.  Observational Learning: Tell Beginners What They Are about to Watch and They Will Learn Better.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-29

10.  The influence of social interaction on cognitive training for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jennifer Louise Cook; Jennifer Black
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.