Literature DB >> 20640779

Colorectal cancer screening: patients' and physicians' perspectives on decision-making factors.

Yelena N Tarasenko1, Sarah B Wackerbarth, Margaret M Love, Jennifer M Joyce, Steven A Haist.   

Abstract

While patient barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening have been identified, how well this knowledge is utilized during the patient-physician interaction is not fully understood. This study aims to assess among primary care physicians the degree of consensus between perceived and actual patients' CRC screening decision-making influential factors. During 2004-2006, 30 patients were interviewed to identify factors influencing screening decisions and 66 physicians were interviewed to understand what factors they thought were important to patients. The factors were categorized using the PRECEDE-PROCEED framework, and perspectives were compared. The researchers found little consensus on CRC screening decision-making influential factors between family practitioners, general internists, and patients. The recommendations to reach consensus are provided on the individual (e.g., updating the contents of a physician's screening recommendation to proactively address patients' decision-making needs) and population (e.g., providing cross-cultural training to medical students enabling them to better understand their patients) levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20640779     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-010-0145-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  16 in total

1.  Determining local colorectal cancer screening utilization patterns.

Authors:  Donald A Cibula; Cynthia B Morrow
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug

2.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon; Marion R Nadel; Nancy Breen; Laura C Seeff; Martin L Brown
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale.

Authors:  S J Winawer; R H Fletcher; L Miller; F Godlee; M H Stolar; C D Mulrow; S H Woolf; S N Glick; T G Ganiats; J H Bond; L Rosen; J G Zapka; S J Olsen; F M Giardiello; J E Sisk; R Van Antwerp; C Brown-Davis; D A Marciniak; R J Mayer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  "Do we really need all that equipment?": factors influencing colorectal cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  Sarah B Wackerbarth; Jane C Peters; Steven A Haist
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-04

Review 5.  Current colorectal cancer screening strategies: overview and obstacles to implementation.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Disord       Date:  2002

6.  Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention.

Authors:  C Beeker; J M Kraft; B G Southwell; C M Jorgensen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

Review 7.  Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Kimberly S Andrews; Durado Brooks; John Bond; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; David Johnson; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; Perry J Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Robert A Smith; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior?

Authors:  Aimee S James; Marci Kramish Campbell; Marlyn Allicock Hudson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Declining the offer of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for bowel cancer: a qualitative investigation of the decision-making process.

Authors:  K McCaffery; J Borril; S Williamson; T Taylor; S Sutton; W Atkin; J Wardle
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening.

Authors:  J Wardle; S Sutton; S Williamson; T Taylor; K McCaffery; J Cuzick; A Hart; W Atkin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Evidence, values, guidelines and rational decision-making.

Authors:  Bruce Barrett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  'Simple and easy:' providers' and latinos' perceptions of the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Claudia X Aguado Loi; Dinorah Martinez Tyson; Enmanuel A Chavarria; Liliana Gutierrez; Lynne Klasko; Stacy Davis; Diana Lopez; Tracy Johns; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  How Do Older Adults Consider Age, Life Expectancy, Quality of Life, and Physician Recommendations When Making Cancer Screening Decisions? Results from a National Survey Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Ellen M Janssen; Craig E Pollack; Cynthia Boyd; John F P Bridges; Qian-Li Xue; Antonio C Wolff; Nancy L Schoenborn
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Examining Generalizability of Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Cessation of Screening Colonoscopies in Older Adults with Low Health Literacy.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Norah L Crossnohere; Ellen M Janssen; Craig E Pollack; Cynthia M Boyd; Antonio C Wolff; Qian-Li Xue; Jacqueline Massare; Marcela Blinka; John F P Bridges
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Masculinity, Racism, Social Support, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among African American Men: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Charles R Rogers; Jamie A Mitchell; Gabriel J Franta; Margaret J Foster; Deirdre Shires
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-10-18

6.  Effectiveness of a primary care practice intervention for increasing colorectal cancer screening in Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Mark Dignan; Brent Shelton; Stacey A Slone; Cheri Tolle; Sohail Mohammad; Nancy Schoenberg; Kevin Pearce; Emily Van Meter; Gretchen Ely
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older rural Appalachian women.

Authors:  Christina R Studts; Yelena N Tarasenko; Nancy E Schoenberg
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-06

8.  Making it work: health care provider perspectives on strategies to increase colorectal cancer screening in federally qualified health centers.

Authors:  Clement K Gwede; Stacy N Davis; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Alexis M Koskan; Jamila Ealey; Rania Abdulla; Susan T Vadaparampil; Gloria Elliott; Diana Lopez; David Shibata; Richard G Roetzheim; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Demographic, health, and attitudinal factors predictive of cancer screening decisions in older adults.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Qian-Li Xue; Craig E Pollack; Ellen M Janssen; John F P Bridges; Antonio C Wolff; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-01-16

Review 10.  Aspects of colorectal cancer screening, methods, age and gender.

Authors:  R Hultcrantz
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 8.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.