Literature DB >> 31226903

How Do Older Adults Consider Age, Life Expectancy, Quality of Life, and Physician Recommendations When Making Cancer Screening Decisions? Results from a National Survey Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Ellen M Janssen1,2, Craig E Pollack3, Cynthia Boyd3, John F P Bridges4, Qian-Li Xue3, Antonio C Wolff3, Nancy L Schoenborn3.   

Abstract

Background. Older adults with limited life expectancy frequently receive cancer screening, although on average, harms outweigh benefits. We examined the influence of life expectancy on older adults' cancer screening decisions relative to three other factors. Methods. Adults aged 65+ years (N = 1272) were recruited from a national online survey panel. Using a discrete choice experiment, we systematically varied a hypothetical patient's life expectancy, age, quality of life, and physician's recommendation and asked whether the participant would choose screening. Participants were randomized to questions about colonoscopy or prostate-specific antigen/mammography screenings. Logistic regression produced preference weights that quantified the relative influence of the 4 factors on screening decisions. Results. 879 older adults completed the survey, 660 of whom varied their screening choices in response to the 4 factors we tested. The age of the hypothetical patient had the largest influence on choosing screening: the effect of age being 65 versus 85 years had a preference weight of 2.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.22, 2.65). Life expectancy (10 versus 1 year) had the second largest influence (preference weight: 1.64, CI: 1.41, 1.87). Physician recommendation (screen versus do not screen) and quality of life (good versus poor) were less influential, with preference weights of 0.90 (CI: 0.72, 1.08) and 0.68 (CI: 0.52, 0.83), respectively. Conclusions. While clinical practice guidelines increasingly use life expectancy in addition to age to guide screening decisions, we find that age is the most influential factor, independent of life expectancy, quality of life, and physician recommendation, in older adults' cancer screening choices. Strategies to reduce overscreening should consider the importance patients give to continuing screening at younger ages, even when life expectancy is limited.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; decision making; discrete choice experiment; older adults; patient preferences

Year:  2019        PMID: 31226903      PMCID: PMC7080208          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19853516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  50 in total

1.  Validation of a Short, 3-Item Version of the Subjective Numeracy Scale.

Authors:  Candace D McNaughton; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Sunil Kripalani; Russell L Rothman; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  A Look at Person- and Family-Centered Care Among Older Adults: Results from a National Survey [corrected].

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Cynthia M Boyd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Preferred Clinician Communication About Stopping Cancer Screening Among Older US Adults: Results From a National Survey.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Ellen M Janssen; Cynthia M Boyd; John F P Bridges; Antonio C Wolff; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber; Juan Marcos González; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Thomas Prior; Deborah A Marshall; Charles Cunningham; Maarten J IJzerman; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Medical center characteristics associated with PSA screening in elderly veterans with limited life expectancy.

Authors:  Cynthia So; Katharine A Kirby; Kala Mehta; Richard M Hoffman; Adam A Powell; Stephen J Freedland; Brenda Sirovich; Elizabeth M Yano; Louise C Walter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Targeting of mammography screening according to life expectancy in women aged 75 and older.

Authors:  Mara A Schonberg; Erica S Breslau; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010.

Authors:  Andrew M D Wolf; Richard C Wender; Ruth B Etzioni; Ian M Thompson; Anthony V D'Amico; Robert J Volk; Durado D Brooks; Chiranjeev Dash; Idris Guessous; Kimberly Andrews; Carol DeSantis; Robert A Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 8.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Margaret A Piper; Leslie A Perdue; Carolyn M Rutter; Elizabeth M Webber; Elizabeth O'Connor; Ning Smith; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Predicting 10-year mortality for older adults.

Authors:  Marisa Cruz; Kenneth Covinsky; Eric W Widera; Irena Stijacic-Cenzer; Sei J Lee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults' Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jenna Smith; Rachael H Dodd; Karen M Gainey; Vasi Naganathan; Erin Cvejic; Jesse Jansen; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

2.  Factors Associated With Declining Lung Cancer Screening After Discussion With a Physician in a Cohort of US Veterans.

Authors:  Eduardo R Núñez; Tanner J Caverly; Sanqian Zhang; Mark E Glickman; Shirley X Qian; Jacqueline H Boudreau; Donald R Miller; Christopher G Slatore; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.