Literature DB >> 15761097

"Do we really need all that equipment?": factors influencing colorectal cancer screening decisions.

Sarah B Wackerbarth1, Jane C Peters, Steven A Haist.   

Abstract

The lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer is 2.5 to 5% in the general population. Colorectal screening can prevent mortality, and there are a number of screening methods, ranging from noninvasive to highly invasive. Although recommendations have been widely disseminated in the media and scientific journals, screening usage is low. In this project, the authors examine the factors that influence individuals' decisions regarding colorectal screening. They conducted semistructured interviews with 30 people (13 men and 17 women) selected to provide a maximum variation sample. They categorized factors into the following themes: concern for one's personal well-being, competing demands, preparing for the procedure, the screening process, gender concerns, fear of having cancer, feeling healthy, cost, the experiences of others, and turning 50 years old.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15761097     DOI: 10.1177/1049732304273759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  9 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening: patients' and physicians' perspectives on decision-making factors.

Authors:  Yelena N Tarasenko; Sarah B Wackerbarth; Margaret M Love; Jennifer M Joyce; Steven A Haist
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Masculinity Beliefs and Colorectal Cancer Screening in Male Veterans.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Catherine E Mosher; Susan M Rawl; David A Haggstrom
Journal:  Psychol Men Masc       Date:  2016-06-16

3.  How do rural health care providers and patients view barriers to colorectal cancer screening? Insights from appalachian kentucky.

Authors:  Jennifer Hatcher; Mark B Dignan; Nancy Schoenberg
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.208

4.  Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making.

Authors:  Sarah B Wackerbarth; Yelena N Tarasenko; Jennifer M Joyce; Steven A Haist
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-11-13

5.  Integrating men's health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Catherine E Mosher; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2013-06-27

6.  Reasons for non-uptake and subsequent participation in the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study.

Authors:  C K Palmer; M C Thomas; C von Wagner; R Raine
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  What Do Men Want from a Health Screening Mobile App? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Chin Hai Teo; Chirk Jenn Ng; Alan White
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing emotions conveyed and elicited by patient narratives and their impact on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A psychophysiological investigation.

Authors:  Teresa Gavaruzzi; Michela Sarlo; Francesca Giandomenico; Rino Rumiati; Francesca Polato; Franca De Lazzari; Lorella Lotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Gladys N Honein-Abouhaidar; Monika Kastner; Vincent Vuong; Laure Perrier; Linda Rabeneck; Jill Tinmouth; Sharon Straus; Nancy N Baxter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.