Literature DB >> 31452029

Examining Generalizability of Older Adults' Preferences for Discussing Cessation of Screening Colonoscopies in Older Adults with Low Health Literacy.

Nancy L Schoenborn1, Norah L Crossnohere2,3, Ellen M Janssen4, Craig E Pollack2, Cynthia M Boyd5, Antonio C Wolff5, Qian-Li Xue5,2, Jacqueline Massare5, Marcela Blinka5, John F P Bridges3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Many older adults receive unnecessary screening colonoscopies. We previously conducted a survey using a national online panel to assess older adults' preferences for how clinicians can discuss stopping screening colonoscopies. We sought to assess the generalizability of those results by comparing them to a sample of older adults with low health literacy.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: Baltimore metropolitan area (low health literacy sample) and a national, probability-based online panel-KnowledgePanel (national sample). PARTICIPANTS: Adults 65+ with low health literacy measured using a single-question screen (low health literacy sample, n = 113) and KnowledgePanel members 65+ who completed survey about colorectal cancer screening (national sample, n = 441). MEASUREMENTS: The same survey was administered to both groups. Using the best-worst scaling method, we assessed relative preferences for 13 different ways to explain stopping screening colonoscopies. We used conditional logistic regression to quantify the relative preference for each explanation, where a higher preference weight indicates stronger preference. We analyzed each sample separately, then compared the two samples using Spearman's correlation coefficient, the likelihood ratio test to assess for overall differences between the two sets of preference weights, and the Wald test to assess differences in preference weights for each individual phrases.
RESULTS: The responses from the two samples were highly correlated (Spearman's coefficient 0.92, p < 0.0001). The most preferred phrase to explain stopping screening colonoscopy was "Your other health issues should take priority" in both groups. The three least preferred options were also the same for both groups, with the least preferred being "The doctor does not give an explanation." The explanation that referred to "quality of life" was more preferred by the low health literacy group whereas explanations that mentioned "unlikely to benefit" and "high risk for harms" were more preferred by the national survey group (all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Among two different populations of older adults with different health literacy levels, the preferred strategies for clinicians to discuss stopping screening colonoscopies were highly correlated. Our results can inform effective communication about stopping screening colonoscopies in older adults across different health literacy levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer screening; colorectal cancer; communication; health literacy; patient preferences

Year:  2019        PMID: 31452029      PMCID: PMC6848333          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05258-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  46 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening: patients' and physicians' perspectives on decision-making factors.

Authors:  Yelena N Tarasenko; Sarah B Wackerbarth; Margaret M Love; Jennifer M Joyce; Steven A Haist
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Darren A Dewalt; Nancy D Berkman; Stacey Sheridan; Kathleen N Lohr; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber; Juan Marcos González; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Thomas Prior; Deborah A Marshall; Charles Cunningham; Maarten J IJzerman; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  Brief report: screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills.

Authors:  Lorraine S Wallace; Edwin S Rogers; Steven E Roskos; David B Holiday; Barry D Weiss
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stuart J Wright; Caroline M Vass; Gene Sim; Michael Burton; Denzil G Fiebig; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Jennifer S Lin; Margaret A Piper; Leslie A Perdue; Carolyn M Rutter; Elizabeth M Webber; Elizabeth O'Connor; Ning Smith; Evelyn P Whitlock
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Primary care providers' perspectives on discontinuing prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Craig E Pollack; Elizabeth A Platz; Nrupen A Bhavsar; Gary Noronha; Gene E Green; Sean Chen; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Primary Care Practitioners' Views on Incorporating Long-term Prognosis in the Care of Older Adults.

Authors:  Nancy L Schoenborn; Theron L Bowman; Danelle Cayea; Craig Evan Pollack; Scott Feeser; Cynthia Boyd
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Russell P Harris; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  2 in total

1.  Parental Hesitancy About Routine Childhood and Influenza Vaccinations: A National Survey.

Authors:  Allison Kempe; Alison W Saville; Christina Albertin; Gregory Zimet; Abigail Breck; Laura Helmkamp; Sitaram Vangala; L Miriam Dickinson; Cindy Rand; Sharon Humiston; Peter G Szilagyi
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Prevalence and characteristics of HPV vaccine hesitancy among parents of adolescents across the US.

Authors:  Peter G Szilagyi; Christina S Albertin; Dennis Gurfinkel; Alison W Saville; Sitaram Vangala; John D Rice; Laura Helmkamp; Gregory D Zimet; Rebecca Valderrama; Abigail Breck; Cynthia M Rand; Sharon G Humiston; Allison Kempe
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 4.169

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.