Literature DB >> 23179390

Barriers to cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older rural Appalachian women.

Christina R Studts1, Yelena N Tarasenko, Nancy E Schoenberg.   

Abstract

Although cervical cancer rates in the United States have declined sharply in recent decades, certain groups of women remain at elevated risk, including middle-aged and older women in central Appalachia. Cross-sectional baseline data from a community-based randomized controlled trial were examined to identify barriers to cervical cancer screening. Questionnaires assessing barriers were administered to 345 Appalachian women aged 40-64, years when Papanicolaou (Pap) testing declines and cervical cancer rates increase. Consistent with the PRECEDE/PROCEED framework, participants identified barriers included predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors. Descriptive and bivariate analyses are reported, identifying (a) the most frequently endorsed barriers to screening, and (b) significant associations of barriers with sociodemographic characteristics in the sample. Recommendations are provided to decrease these barriers and, ultimately, improve rates of Pap tests among this traditionally underserved and disproportionately affected group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23179390      PMCID: PMC3600402          DOI: 10.1007/s10900-012-9639-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  42 in total

1.  Facilitators and barriers to cervical cancer screening among Chinese Canadian women.

Authors:  T G Hislop; M Deschamps; C Teh; C Jackson; S P Tu; Y Yasui; S M Schwartz; A Kuniyuki; V Taylor
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

2.  Knowledge, attitudes and practices of rural women in South Africa regarding the Pap smear.

Authors:  M Lartey; G Joubert; H S Cronje
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Use of Pap test among Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites in a rural setting.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Beti Thompson; Thomas D Koepsell; Stephen M Schwartz; Dale McLerran
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Empowering factors in repeat mammography: insights from the stories of underserved women.

Authors:  Nasar U Ahmed; Jane G Fort; Jared D Elzey; Stephanie Bailey
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2004 Oct-Dec

5.  Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. IARC Working Group on evaluation of cervical cancer screening programmes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-09-13

6.  Compliance rates and predictors of cancer screening recommendations among Appalachian women.

Authors:  Mayur M Amonkar; Suresh Madhavan
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2002-11

7.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: an educational diagnosis.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Celia Shmukler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Patient and provider barriers to colorectal cancer screening in the primary care safety-net.

Authors:  A S O'Malley; E Beaton; K R Yabroff; R Abramson; J Mandelblatt
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society Guidelines.

Authors:  S J McPhee; R J Richard; S N Solkowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Pap testing adherence among Vietnamese American women.

Authors:  Victoria M Taylor; Yutaka Yasui; Nancy Burke; Tung Nguyen; Elizabeth Acorda; Hue Thai; Pingping Qu; J Carey Jackson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  15 in total

1.  Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Perspectives from health-care providers and women about completing human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing at home.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Barret J Zimmermann; Deborah Moore; Electra D Paskett; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2016-10-04

3.  Psychosocial Correlates of Ever Having a Pap Test and Abnormal Pap Results in a Sample of Rural Appalachian Women.

Authors:  Kristen P Mark; Richard A Crosby; Robin C Vanderpool
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  A Community-Academic Partnership to Increase Pap Testing in Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Tom Collins; Lindsay R Stradtman; Robin C Vanderpool; Deborah R Neace; Karen D Cooper
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Adherence to Multiple Cancer Screening Tests among Women Living in Appalachia Ohio.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Paul L Reiter; Gregory S Young; Michael L Pennell; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Using communication to manage uncertainty about cervical cancer screening guideline adherence among Appalachian women.

Authors:  Elisia L Cohen; Allison Scott Gordon; Rachael Record; Sara Shaunfield; Grace M Jones; Tom Collins
Journal:  J Appl Commun Res       Date:  2016-02-18

7.  Influencing factors on cervical cancer screening from the Kurdish women's perspective: A qualitative study.

Authors:  V H Rasul; M A Cheraghi; Z Behboodi Moqadam
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015

8.  Factors that influence enrollment in syringe services programs in rural areas: a qualitative study among program clients in Appalachian Kentucky.

Authors:  Umedjon Ibragimov; Katherine E Cooper; Evan Batty; April M Ballard; Monica Fadanelli; Skylar B Gross; Emma M Klein; Scott Lockard; April M Young; Hannah L F Cooper
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2021-06-30

9.  A Multilevel Approach to Understand the Context and Potential Solutions for Low Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Rates in Rural Appalachia Clinics.

Authors:  Jamie Zoellner; Kathleen Porter; Esther Thatcher; Erin Kennedy; James L Werth; Betsy Grossman; Tomas Roatsey; Heather Hamilton; Roger Anderson; Wendy Cohn
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.667

10.  Self-administered versus provider-directed sampling in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study (ACCSS): a qualitative investigation with Canadian First Nations women.

Authors:  Ingeborg Zehbe; Pamela Wakewich; Amy-Dee King; Kyla Morrisseau; Candace Tuck
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.