Literature DB >> 11006057

Psychosocial influences on older adults' interest in participating in bowel cancer screening.

J Wardle1, S Sutton, S Williamson, T Taylor, K McCaffery, J Cuzick, A Hart, W Atkin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As part of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of flexible sigmoidoscopy for the prevention of bowel cancer, an investigation of the predictors of screening interest was carried out in a subsample of older adults.
METHOD: The aim of the study was to establish the predictive power of the Health Belief Model (HBM) and to evaluate the contribution of HBM elements in mediating the effect of other demographic and health variables which have been found to be associated with screening interest and participation. A total of 5,099 participants were sent a postal questionnaire which examined screening interest, attitudes toward screen ing (benefits and barriers), perceived bowel cancer risk, bowel cancer worry, bowel symptoms, health status, state anxiety, and optimism. A total of 3,648 questionnaires were returned completed, giving a response rate of 71.5%.
RESULTS: The results showed that threat, barriers, and benefits explained 47% of the variance in interest. Demographic and health variables were also associated with screening interest, although most of their effect was mediated by the HBM constructs. DISCUSSION: This community study in older adults showed a high level of interest in participating in screening. The large sample size provided the opportunity to test the value of the HBM model and to examine mediation of demographic and health variables. The HBM proved to be a good model of screening interest. These results further our understanding of the decision processes in participating in cancer screening and point to directions to increase the level of participation in community samples. Copyright 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11006057     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  52 in total

1.  Socioeconomic differences in attitudes and beliefs about healthy lifestyles.

Authors:  J Wardle; A Steptoe
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Colorectal cancer screening: patients' and physicians' perspectives on decision-making factors.

Authors:  Yelena N Tarasenko; Sarah B Wackerbarth; Margaret M Love; Jennifer M Joyce; Steven A Haist
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Modeling pathways to affective barriers on colorectal cancer screening among Japanese Americans.

Authors:  Keiko Honda; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

5.  Structure-analysis method for electronic cleansing in cathartic and noncathartic CT colonography.

Authors:  Wenli Cai; Michael E Zalis; Janne Näppi; Gordon J Harris; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  No association between colorectal cancer worry and screening uptake in Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Adana A Llanos; Michael L Pennell; Gregory S Young; Cathy M Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.341

7.  Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.

Authors:  Alejandro G Hughes; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway; Paulette Schnell; Amr S Soliman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-12

8.  Interactions among physicians, patients, and first-degree relatives in the familial screening of colorectal cancer in France.

Authors:  Isabelle Ingrand; Sarah Dujoncquoy; Virginie Migeot; Véronique Ghadi; Michel Beauchant; Pierre Ingrand
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

9.  Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among the US urban Japanese population.

Authors:  Keiko Honda
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Factors associated with a physician's recommendation for colorectal cancer screening in a diverse population.

Authors:  Navkiran K Shokar; Tracy Nguyen-Oghalai; Helen Wu
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.