Literature DB >> 27281743

A physiological and behavioral system for hearing restoration with cochlear implants.

Julia King1, Ina Shehu2, J Thomas Roland3, Mario A Svirsky4, Robert C Froemke5.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants are neuroprosthetic devices that provide hearing to deaf patients, although outcomes are highly variable even with prolonged training and use. The central auditory system must process cochlear implant signals, but it is unclear how neural circuits adapt-or fail to adapt-to such inputs. The knowledge of these mechanisms is required for development of next-generation neuroprosthetics that interface with existing neural circuits and enable synaptic plasticity to improve perceptual outcomes. Here, we describe a new system for cochlear implant insertion, stimulation, and behavioral training in rats. Animals were first ensured to have significant hearing loss via physiological and behavioral criteria. We developed a surgical approach for multichannel (2- or 8-channel) array insertion, comparable with implantation procedures and depth in humans. Peripheral and cortical responses to stimulation were used to program the implant objectively. Animals fitted with implants learned to use them for an auditory-dependent task that assesses frequency detection and recognition in a background of environmentally and self-generated noise and ceased responding appropriately to sounds when the implant was temporarily inactivated. This physiologically calibrated and behaviorally validated system provides a powerful opportunity to study the neural basis of neuroprosthetic device use and plasticity.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; behavior; cochlear implants; deafness; rats

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27281743      PMCID: PMC4995281          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00048.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  71 in total

1.  AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.

Authors:  Andrew Botros; Bas van Dijk; Matthijs Killian
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  L A J Reiss; C W Turner; S A Karsten; B J Gantz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. II. Repetition rate coding.

Authors:  C E Schreiner; M W Raggio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Cochlear implantation in rats: a new surgical approach.

Authors:  Wei Lu; Jin Xu; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Chronic electrical stimulation does not prevent spiral ganglion cell degeneration in deafened guinea pigs.

Authors:  Martijn J H Agterberg; Huib Versnel; John C M J de Groot; Marloes van den Broek; Sjaak F L Klis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Hearing after congenital deafness: central auditory plasticity and sensory deprivation.

Authors:  A Kral; R Hartmann; J Tillein; S Heid; R Klinke
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Mouse cochleostomy: a minimally invasive dorsal approach for modeling cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Hakan Soken; Barbara K Robinson; Shawn S Goodman; Paul J Abbas; Marlan R Hansen; Jonathan C Kopelovich
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Measurement of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) to study auditory sensitivity in mice.

Authors:  James F Willott
Journal:  Curr Protoc Neurosci       Date:  2006-02

9.  Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making.

Authors:  Bingni W Brunton; Matthew M Botvinick; Carlos D Brody
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Cochlear implant use following neonatal deafness influences the cochleotopic organization of the primary auditory cortex in cats.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Dexter R F Irvine; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  8 in total

1.  Locus coeruleus activation accelerates perceptual learning.

Authors:  Erin Glennon; Ioana Carcea; Ana Raquel O Martins; Jasmin Multani; Ina Shehu; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Erin Glennon; Mario A Svirsky; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Multiscale photonic imaging of the native and implanted cochlea.

Authors:  Daniel Keppeler; Christoph A Kampshoff; Anupriya Thirumalai; Carlos J Duque-Afonso; Jannis J Schaeper; Tabea Quilitz; Mareike Töpperwien; Christian Vogl; Roland Hessler; Alexander Meyer; Tim Salditt; Tobias Moser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Dynamics of auditory cortical activity during behavioural engagement and auditory perception.

Authors:  Ioana Carcea; Michele N Insanally; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation.

Authors:  Alexander D Claussen; René Vielman Quevedo; Brian Mostaert; Jonathon R Kirk; Wolfram F Dueck; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25

7.  Spike-timing-dependent ensemble encoding by non-classically responsive cortical neurons.

Authors:  Michele N Insanally; Ioana Carcea; Rachel E Field; Chris C Rodgers; Brian DePasquale; Kanaka Rajan; Michael R DeWeese; Badr F Albanna; Robert C Froemke
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Ramped pulse shapes are more efficient for cochlear implant stimulation in an animal model.

Authors:  Charlotte Amalie Navntoft; Jeremy Marozeau; Tania Rinaldi Barkat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.