Literature DB >> 17063007

Adaptation to distorted frequency-to-place maps: implications of simulations in normal listeners for cochlear implants and electroacoustic stimulation.

Andrew Faulkner1.   

Abstract

The ideal cochlear implant electrode array positioning enables stimulation over a range of cochlear positions whose characteristic frequencies cover the frequency range of speech and match the speech processor filter frequencies. However, the electrode positions achieved in practice may not meet this specification. Users of conventional monaural cochlear implants seem able to perceptually adapt to a mismatch of speech processor filters to electrode positions. In electroacoustic stimulation, it is important to consider possible inconsistencies between acoustic and electrical frequency-to-place mapping. Two simulation studies are outlined that address normal listeners' ability to perceive speech presented through distorted frequency maps. The first presented a map that is spectrally warped around a 10-mm medial cochlear area. Listeners were able to adapt to this map after a few hours of training. The second study presented a binaural mapping in which one ear was subject to a 6-mm basalward shift. Here listeners were unable to learn to integrate speech information across the two mismatched ears, rather they seem to learn to ignore the shifted information. Frequency-to-place mapping is likely to be an important factor in the successful use of a combination of electrical and acoustic hearing. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17063007     DOI: 10.1159/000095610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  14 in total

1.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The effects of frequency-place shift on consonant confusion in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu; Chao-Yang Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Maximizing cochlear implant patients' performance with advanced speech training procedures.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion.

Authors:  Stephen J Rebscher; Alexander Hetherington; Ben Bonham; Peter Wardrop; David Whinney; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

6.  Spectral and temporal analysis of simulated dead regions in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Il Joon Moon; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-05

7.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Thomas M Talavage; Shivank Sinha; Heidi Neuburger; Mahan Azadpour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Effect of Place-Based Versus Default Mapping Procedures on Masked Speech Recognition: Simulations of Cochlear Implant Alone and Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Margaret T Dillon; Brendan P O'Connell; Michael W Canfarotta; Emily Buss; Joseph Hopfinger
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.636

9.  Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Finley; Timothy A Holden; Laura K Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Richard A Chole; Gail J Neely; Timothy E Hullar; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Lexical tone recognition with spectrally mismatched envelopes.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.