Literature DB >> 20628735

The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study.

Jie-Yu Lv1, Ting Wang, Jiang Qiu, Si-Hai Feng, Shen Tu, Dong-Tao Wei.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were used to examine the electrophysiological effect of working memory (WM) load on involuntary attention caused by a task-irrelevant sound in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm. The different WM loads were manipulated by requiring subjects to remember the order of either three digits (low-load condition) or seven digits (high-load condition), and the irrelevant auditory stimuli consisted of repetitive standard sounds (80%) and environmental novel sounds (20%). We found that the difference waves (novel-minus-standard) showed significant MMN and Novelty-P3 components in the two WM load conditions. The amplitude of MMN increased with increasing the WM load, which indicated a more engaged change detection process under high-load condition. Then, the amplitude of Novelty-P3 was attenuated under high-load condition, which indicated a much reduced involuntary orienting of attention to novel sounds when increasing the WM load. These results indicated the top-down control of involuntary attention might be mainly active at the early change detection stage and the control of the later involuntary orienting of attention might be passive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628735     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2360-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Attention and performance.

Authors:  H Pashler; J C Johnston; E Ruthruff
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 2.  An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  The prefrontal cortex--an update: time is of the essence.

Authors:  J M Fuster
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

Review 5.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 6.  Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain.

Authors:  B R Postle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  Interactions between attention and working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; E K Vogel; S-H Oh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.

Authors:  Soojin Park; Min-Shik Kim; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.

Authors:  C Escera; K Alho; I Winkler; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Processing of novel sounds and frequency changes in the human auditory cortex: magnetoencephalographic recordings.

Authors:  K Alho; I Winkler; C Escera; M Huotilainen; J Virtanen; I P Jääskeläinen; E Pekkonen; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  7 in total

1.  Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  J Schomaker; M Meeter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Single-Channel EEG Features Reveal an Association With Cognitive Decline in Seniors Performing Auditory Cognitive Assessment.

Authors:  Lior Molcho; Neta B Maimon; Noa Regev-Plotnik; Sarit Rabinowicz; Nathan Intrator; Ady Sasson
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.702

3.  Brain dynamics that correlate with effects of learning on auditory distance perception.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Eduardo Mercado; Barbara A Church; Klaus Gramann; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Increasing Working Memory Load Reduces Processing of Cross-Modal Task-Irrelevant Stimuli Even after Controlling for Task Difficulty and Executive Capacity.

Authors:  Sharon S Simon; Erich S Tusch; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Does working memory protect against auditory distraction in older adults?

Authors:  Yatin Mahajan; Jeesun Kim; Chris Davis
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Tablet PC use directly affects children's perception and attention.

Authors:  Nicole Wetzel; Dunja Kunke; Andreas Widmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High Working Memory Load Impairs Language Processing during a Simulated Piloting Task: An ERP and Pupillometry Study.

Authors:  Mickaël Causse; Vsevolod Peysakhovich; Eve F Fabre
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.