Literature DB >> 9802992

Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.

C Escera1, K Alho, I Winkler, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

Behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures were used to elucidate the neural mechanisms of involuntary engagement of attention by novelty and change in the acoustic environment. The behavioral measures consisted of the reaction time (RT) and performance accuracy (hit rate) in a forced-choice visual RT task where subjects were to discriminate between odd and even numbers. Each visual stimulus was preceded by an irrelevant auditory stimulus, which was randomly either a "standard" tone (80%), a slightly higher "deviant" tone (10%), or a natural, "novel" sound (10%). Novel sounds prolonged the RT to successive visual stimuli by 17 msec as compared with the RT to visual stimuli that followed standard tones. Deviant tones, in turn, decreased the hit rate but did not significantly affect the RT. In the ERPs to deviant tones, the mismatch negativity (MMN), peaking at 150 msec, and a second negativity, peaking at 400 msec, could be observed. Novel sounds elicited an enhanced N1, with a probable overlap by the MMN, and a large positive P3a response with two different subcomponents: an early centrally dominant P3a, peaking at 230 msec, and a late P3a, peaking at 315 msec with a right-frontal scalp maximum. The present results suggest the involvement of two different neural mechanisms in triggering involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change: a transient-detector mechanism activated by novel sounds and reflected in the N1 and a stimulus-change detector mechanism activated by deviant tones and novel sounds and reflected in the MMN. The observed differential distracting effects by slightly deviant tones and widely deviant novel sounds support the notion of two separate mechanisms of involuntary attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9802992     DOI: 10.1162/089892998562997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  174 in total

1.  Novelty-elicited mismatch negativity in patients with schizophrenia on admission and discharge.

Authors:  I Grzella; B W Müller; R D Oades; S Bender; U Schall; D Zerbin; J Wolstein; G Sartory
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 2.  Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Adriaan Moelker; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality.

Authors:  E Sussman; I Winkler; E Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  Automatic attention to emotional stimuli: neural correlates.

Authors:  Luis Carretié; José A Hinojosa; Manuel Martín-Loeches; Francisco Mercado; Manuel Tapia
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Facilitating masked visual target identification with auditory oddball stimuli.

Authors:  Mary Kim Ngo; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  ERP correlates of response inhibition after-effects in the stop signal task.

Authors:  Daniel J Upton; Peter G Enticott; Rodney J Croft; Nicholas R Cooper; Paul B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reliability of early cortical auditory gamma-band responses.

Authors:  Mackenzie C Cervenka; Piotr J Franaszczuk; Nathan E Crone; Bo Hong; Brian S Caffo; Paras Bhatt; Frederick A Lenz; Dana Boatman-Reich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Salience in a social landscape: electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant and infrequent vocal change.

Authors:  Ana P Pinheiro; Carla Barros; João Pedrosa
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Novelty detection in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Lavinia Slabu; Sabine Grimm; Carles Escera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Human striatal activation reflects degree of stimulus saliency.

Authors:  Caroline F Zink; Giuseppe Pagnoni; Jonathan Chappelow; Megan Martin-Skurski; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.