Literature DB >> 24402203

Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.

J Schomaker1, M Meeter.   

Abstract

Novel stimuli are detected and evaluated quickly, suggesting that processing them is a priority for the brain. In the present study, the effects of attention on this early visual novelty processing were investigated in two experiments using the event-related potential (ERP) technique. In the first experiment, participants performed two tasks that varied in the amount of attention available for novel stimuli. In the Visual Oddball task, participants responded to an infrequent target presented among standard and novel stimuli. In the Working Memory task, participants saw the same stimuli, but they could ignore them. Instead, participants had to keep six letters in working memory and report one of these letters at the end of the trial; attention was thus maximally allocated away from the visual oddball stimuli. In line with attention being fully occupied in the Working Memory task, the P3a to the visual oddball stimuli was smaller in the Working Memory than in the Visual Oddball task. In contrast, the anterior N2 component to task-irrelevant stimuli was enhanced in the Working Memory task. These findings suggest that the initial detection of novel stimuli is enhanced (large anterior N2) when few attentional resources are available, which is inconsistent with earlier findings that if anything, the N2 is enhanced by attention. In a second experiment, a condition was added in which working memory load was low, but visual oddball stimuli were task-irrelevant. Results from this experiment showed that while the reduction in P3a amplitude was due to task irrelevance, the enhanced anterior N2 was linked to a high working memory load. This suggests that novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24402203     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3811-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  66 in total

1.  Delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex: one function is sensory gating.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Evaluation of PCA and ICA of simulated ERPs: Promax vs. Infomax rotations.

Authors:  Joseph Dien; Wayne Khoe; George R Mangun
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Novelty and conflict in the categorization of complex stimuli.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten; Scott A Rose
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential.

Authors:  Stefan Berti
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change.

Authors:  C Escera; K Alho; I Winkler; R Näätänen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  ERPs to response production and inhibition.

Authors:  A Pfefferbaum; J M Ford; B J Weller; B S Kopell
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-05

7.  A triarchic model of P300 amplitude.

Authors:  R Johnson
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution.

Authors:  A J Bell; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention.

Authors:  Elise C Tarbi; Xue Sun; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  6 in total

1.  Age-related differences in early novelty processing: using PCA to parse the overlapping anterior P2 and N2 components.

Authors:  Kirk R Daffner; Brittany R Alperin; Katherine K Mott; Erich S Tusch; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Auditory distraction transmitted by a cochlear implant alters allocation of attentional resources.

Authors:  Mareike Finke; Pascale Sandmann; Bruno Kopp; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Response of the Pre-Oriented Goal-Directed Attention to Usual and Unusual Distractors: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Golnaz Baghdadi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Reza Rostami; Mohsen Raza
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

4.  Effects of Directed Attention on Subsequent Processing of Emotions: Increased Attention to Unpleasant Pictures Occurs in the Late Positive Potential.

Authors:  Yuming Chen; Dandan Zhang; Donghong Jiang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-04

5.  Decreased preparatory activation and inattention to cues suggest lower activation of proactive cognitive control among high procrastinating students.

Authors:  Ewa Wiwatowska; Dominik Czajeczny; Jarosław M Michałowski
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Electrophysiological Measures of Tactile and Auditory Processing in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Girija Kadlaskar; Sophia Bergmann; Rebecca McNally Keehn; Amanda Seidl; Brandon Keehn
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.