Literature DB >> 20628637

Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Mark J van der Laan1, Susan Gruber.   

Abstract

Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimators represent a fundamental further advance over standard targeted maximum likelihood estimators of a pathwise differentiable parameter of a data generating distribution in a semiparametric model, introduced in van der Laan, Rubin (2006). The targeted maximum likelihood approach involves fluctuating an initial estimate of a relevant factor (Q) of the density of the observed data, in order to make a bias/variance tradeoff targeted towards the parameter of interest. The fluctuation involves estimation of a nuisance parameter portion of the likelihood, g. TMLE has been shown to be consistent and asymptotically normally distributed (CAN) under regularity conditions, when either one of these two factors of the likelihood of the data is correctly specified, and it is semiparametric efficient if both are correctly specified. In this article we provide a template for applying collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation (C-TMLE) to the estimation of pathwise differentiable parameters in semi-parametric models. The procedure creates a sequence of candidate targeted maximum likelihood estimators based on an initial estimate for Q coupled with a succession of increasingly non-parametric estimates for g. In a departure from current state of the art nuisance parameter estimation, C-TMLE estimates of g are constructed based on a loss function for the targeted maximum likelihood estimator of the relevant factor Q that uses the nuisance parameter to carry out the fluctuation, instead of a loss function for the nuisance parameter itself. Likelihood-based cross-validation is used to select the best estimator among all candidate TMLE estimators of Q(0) in this sequence. A penalized-likelihood loss function for Q is suggested when the parameter of interest is borderline-identifiable. We present theoretical results for "collaborative double robustness," demonstrating that the collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimator is CAN even when Q and g are both mis-specified, providing that g solves a specified score equation implied by the difference between the Q and the true Q(0). This marks an improvement over the current definition of double robustness in the estimating equation literature. We also establish an asymptotic linearity theorem for the C-DR-TMLE of the target parameter, showing that the C-DR-TMLE is more adaptive to the truth, and, as a consequence, can even be super efficient if the first stage density estimator does an excellent job itself with respect to the target parameter. This research provides a template for targeted efficient and robust loss-based learning of a particular target feature of the probability distribution of the data within large (infinite dimensional) semi-parametric models, while still providing statistical inference in terms of confidence intervals and p-values. This research also breaks with a taboo (e.g., in the propensity score literature in the field of causal inference) on using the relevant part of likelihood to fine-tune the fitting of the nuisance parameter/censoring mechanism/treatment mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  G-computation; asymptotic linearity; causal effect; censored data; coarsening at random; collaborative double robust; crossvalidation; double robust; efficient influence curve; estimating function; estimator selection; influence curve; locally efficient; loss-function; marginal structural model; maximum likelihood estimation; model selection; pathwise derivative; semiparametric model; sieve; super efficiency; super-learning; targeted maximum likelihood estimation; targeted nuisance parameter estimator selection; variable importance

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628637      PMCID: PMC2898626          DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  17 in total

1.  Simple optimal weighting of cases and controls in case-control studies.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Why match? Investigating matched case-control study designs with causal effect estimation.

Authors:  Sherri Rose; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Statistical methods for analyzing sequentially randomized trials.

Authors:  Oliver Bembom; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Super learner.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Eric C Polley; Alan E Hubbard
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2007-09-16

5.  Empirical efficiency maximization: improved locally efficient covariate adjustment in randomized experiments and survival analysis.

Authors:  Daniel B Rubin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

Authors:  S A Murphy; M J van der Laan; J M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

9.  Biomarker discovery using targeted maximum-likelihood estimation: application to the treatment of antiretroviral-resistant HIV infection.

Authors:  Oliver Bembom; Maya L Petersen; Soo-Yon Rhee; W Jeffrey Fessel; Sandra E Sinisi; Robert W Shafer; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Leisure-time physical activity and all-cause mortality in an elderly cohort.

Authors:  Oliver Bembom; Mark van der Laan; Thaddeus Haight; Ira Tager
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.822

View more
  54 in total

1.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of natural direct effects.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  The relative performance of targeted maximum likelihood estimators.

Authors:  Kristin E Porter; Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan; Jasjeet S Sekhon
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Simple, efficient estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials using generalized linear models to leverage baseline variables.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Covariate selection with group lasso and doubly robust estimation of causal effects.

Authors:  Brandon Koch; David M Vock; Julian Wolfson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Introduction to Double Robust Methods for Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Shaun R Seaman; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.901

7.  Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lackner; James Jaccard; Laurie Keefer; Darren M Brenner; Rebecca S Firth; Gregory D Gudleski; Frank A Hamilton; Leonard A Katz; Susan S Krasner; Chang-Xing Ma; Christopher D Radziwon; Michael D Sitrin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Visualization tool of variable selection in bias-variance tradeoff for inverse probability weights.

Authors:  Ya-Hui Yu; Kristian B Filion; Lisa M Bodnar; Maria M Brooks; Robert W Platt; Katherine P Himes; Ashley I Naimi
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.

Authors:  Joseph Antonelli; Matthew Cefalu; Nathan Palmer; Denis Agniel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Estimating the Effect of a Community-Based Intervention with Two Communities.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya Petersen; Wenjing Zheng
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2013-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.