Literature DB >> 22499725

Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of natural direct effects.

Wenjing Zheng1, Mark J van der Laan.   

Abstract

In many causal inference problems, one is interested in the direct causal effect of an exposure on an outcome of interest that is not mediated by certain intermediate variables. Robins and Greenland (1992) and Pearl (2001) formalized the definition of two types of direct effects (natural and controlled) under the counterfactual framework. The efficient scores (under a nonparametric model) for the various natural effect parameters and their general robustness conditions, as well as an estimating equation based estimator using the efficient score, are provided in Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser (2011b). In this article, we apply the targeted maximum likelihood framework of van der Laan and Rubin (2006) and van der Laan and Rose (2011) to construct a semiparametric efficient, multiply robust, substitution estimator for the natural direct effect which satisfies the efficient score equation derived in Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser (2011b). We note that the robustness conditions in Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser (2011b) may be weakened, thereby placing less reliance on the estimation of the mediator density. More precisely, the proposed estimator is asymptotically unbiased if either one of the following holds: i) the conditional mean outcome given exposure, mediator, and confounders, and the mediated mean outcome difference are consistently estimated; (ii) the exposure mechanism given confounders, and the conditional mean outcome are consistently estimated; or (iii) the exposure mechanism and the mediator density, or the exposure mechanism and the conditional distribution of the exposure given confounders and mediator, are consistently estimated. If all three conditions hold, then the effect estimate is asymptotically efficient. Extensions to the natural indirect effect are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22499725      PMCID: PMC6055937          DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  14 in total

1.  Direct effect models.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Marginal structural models for the estimation of direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

6.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  The Use of Propensity Scores in Mediation Analysis.

Authors:  Booil Jo; Elizabeth A Stuart; David P Mackinnon; Amiram D Vinokur
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Semiparametric Theory for Causal Mediation Analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen; Ilya Shpitser
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.028

9.  Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome.

Authors:  Tyler J Vanderweele; Stijn Vansteelandt
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 5.363

10.  A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation.

Authors:  Jay S Kaufman; Richard F Maclehose; Sol Kaufman
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2004-10-08
View more
  13 in total

1.  Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators.

Authors:  T J VanderWeele; S Vansteelandt
Journal:  Epidemiol Methods       Date:  2014-01

2.  Estimation of a Semiparametric Natural Direct Effect Model Incorporating Baseline Covariates.

Authors:  E J Tchetgen Tchetgen; I Shpitser
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Inverse odds ratio-weighted estimation for causal mediation analysis.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Identification and efficient estimation of the natural direct effect among the untreated.

Authors:  Samuel D Lendle; Meenakshi S Subbaraman; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Longitudinal Mediation Analysis with Time-varying Mediators and Exposures, with Application to Survival Outcomes.

Authors:  Wenjing Zheng; Mark van der Laan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2017-06-23

6.  Balancing Score Adjusted Targeted Minimum Loss-based Estimation.

Authors:  Samuel David Lendle; Bruce Fireman; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2015-01-10

7.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation in safety analysis.

Authors:  Samuel D Lendle; Bruce Fireman; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Performance Guarantees for Policy Learning.

Authors:  Alex Luedtke; Antoine Chambaz
Journal:  Ann I H P Probab Stat       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.851

9.  Meaningful Causal Decompositions in Health Equity Research: Definition, Identification, and Estimation Through a Weighting Framework.

Authors:  John W Jackson
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Mediation analysis with intermediate confounding: structural equation modeling viewed through the causal inference lens.

Authors:  Bianca L De Stavola; Rhian M Daniel; George B Ploubidis; Nadia Micali
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.