Literature DB >> 18825650

Biomarker discovery using targeted maximum-likelihood estimation: application to the treatment of antiretroviral-resistant HIV infection.

Oliver Bembom1, Maya L Petersen, Soo-Yon Rhee, W Jeffrey Fessel, Sandra E Sinisi, Robert W Shafer, Mark J van der Laan.   

Abstract

Researchers in clinical science and bioinformatics frequently aim to learn which of a set of candidate biomarkers is important in determining a given outcome, and to rank the contributions of the candidates accordingly. This article introduces a new approach to research questions of this type, based on targeted maximum-likelihood estimation of variable importance measures.The methodology is illustrated using an example drawn from the treatment of HIV infection. Specifically, given a list of candidate mutations in the protease enzyme of HIV, we aim to discover mutations that reduce clinical virologic response to antiretroviral regimens containing the protease inhibitor lopinavir. In the context of this data example, the article reviews the motivation for covariate adjustment in the biomarker discovery process. A standard maximum-likelihood approach to this adjustment is compared with the targeted approach introduced here. Implementation of targeted maximum-likelihood estimation in the context of biomarker discovery is discussed, and the advantages of this approach are highlighted. Results of applying targeted maximum-likelihood estimation to identify lopinavir resistance mutations are presented and compared with results based on unadjusted mutation-outcome associations as well as results of a standard maximum-likelihood approach to adjustment.The subset of mutations identified by targeted maximum likelihood as significant contributors to lopinavir resistance is found to be in better agreement with the current understanding of HIV antiretroviral resistance than the corresponding subsets identified by the other two approaches. This finding suggests that targeted estimation of variable importance represents a promising approach to biomarker discovery. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18825650      PMCID: PMC4107931          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase and protease mutation search engine for queries.

Authors:  R W Shafer; D R Jung; B J Betts
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Clinically relevant interpretation of genotype for resistance to abacavir.

Authors:  Françoise Brun-Vézinet; Diane Descamps; Annick Ruffault; Bernard Masquelier; Vincent Calvez; Gilles Peytavin; Fabienne Telles; Laurence Morand-Joubert; Jean-Luc Meynard; Muriel Vray; Dominique Costagliola
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Deletion/substitution/addition algorithm in learning with applications in genomics.

Authors:  Sandra E Sinisi; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2004-08-12

5.  A practical illustration of the importance of realistic individualized treatment rules in causal inference.

Authors:  Oliver Bembom; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.125

6.  Genotypic predictors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance.

Authors:  Soo-Yon Rhee; Jonathan Taylor; Gauhar Wadhera; Asa Ben-Hur; Douglas L Brutlag; Robert W Shafer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phenotypic assays and sequencing are less sensitive than point mutation assays for detection of resistance in mixed HIV-1 genotypic populations.

Authors:  K Van Laethem; K Van Vaerenbergh; J C Schmit; S Sprecher; P Hermans; V De Vroey; R Schuurman; T Harrer; M Witvrouw; E Van Wijngaerden; L Stuyver; M Van Ranst; J Desmyter; E De Clercq; A M Vandamme
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  Treatment for adult HIV infection: 2006 recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel.

Authors:  Scott M Hammer; Michael S Saag; Mauro Schechter; Julio S G Montaner; Robert T Schooley; Donna M Jacobsen; Melanie A Thompson; Charles C J Carpenter; Margaret A Fischl; Brian G Gazzard; Jose M Gatell; Martin S Hirsch; David A Katzenstein; Douglas D Richman; Stefano Vella; Patrick G Yeni; Paul A Volberding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption.

Authors:  Maya L Petersen; Kristin E Porter; Susan Gruber; Yue Wang; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Repeated measures semiparametric regression using targeted maximum likelihood methodology with application to transcription factor activity discovery.

Authors:  Catherine Tuglus; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-01-06

4.  An application of collaborative targeted maximum likelihood estimation in causal inference and genomics.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Targeted estimation of binary variable importance measures with interval-censored outcomes.

Authors:  Stephanie Sapp; Mark J van der Laan; Kimberly Page
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  Comparison of targeted maximum likelihood and shrinkage estimators of parameters in gene networks.

Authors:  Geert Geeven; Mark J van der Laan; Mathisca C M de Gunst
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2012-09-25

7.  Robust Machine Learning Variable Importance Analyses of Medical Conditions for Health Care Spending.

Authors:  Sherri Rose
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Observational research on NCDs in HIV-positive populations: conceptual and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Maya Petersen; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Amy Justice; Matthias Egger
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.731

9.  Social, structural and behavioral determinants of overall health status in a cohort of homeless and unstably housed HIV-infected men.

Authors:  Elise D Riley; Torsten B Neilands; Kelly Moore; Jennifer Cohen; David R Bangsberg; Diane Havlir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Employer-Based Screening for Diabetes and Prediabetes in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study.

Authors:  Sara R Adams; Deanne M Wiley; Andromache Fargeix; Victoria George; Romain S Neugebauer; Julie A Schmittdiel
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.