Literature DB >> 19381345

Empirical efficiency maximization: improved locally efficient covariate adjustment in randomized experiments and survival analysis.

Daniel B Rubin1, Mark J van der Laan.   

Abstract

It has long been recognized that covariate adjustment can increase precision in randomized experiments, even when it is not strictly necessary. Adjustment is often straightforward when a discrete covariate partitions the sample into a handful of strata, but becomes more involved with even a single continuous covariate such as age. As randomized experiments remain a gold standard for scientific inquiry, and the information age facilitates a massive collection of baseline information, the longstanding problem of if and how to adjust for covariates is likely to engage investigators for the foreseeable future. In the locally efficient estimation approach introduced for general coarsened data structures by James Robins and collaborators, one first fits a relatively small working model, often with maximum likelihood, giving a nuisance parameter fit in an estimating equation for the parameter of interest. The usual advertisement is that the estimator will be asymptotically efficient if the working model is correct, but otherwise will still be consistent and asymptotically Gaussian. However, by applying standard likelihood-based fits to misspecified working models in covariate adjustment problems, one can poorly estimate the parameter of interest. We propose a new method, empirical efficiency maximization, to optimize the working model fit for the resulting parameter estimate. In addition to the randomized experiment setting, we show how our covariate adjustment procedure can be used in survival analysis applications. Numerical asymptotic efficiency calculations demonstrate gains relative to standard locally efficient estimators

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inference; instrumental variables

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19381345      PMCID: PMC2669310     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  13 in total

1.  Administrative and artificial censoring in censored regression models.

Authors:  M M Joffe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Administration of parenteral iron and mortality among hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Harold I Feldman; Marshall Joffe; Bruce Robinson; Jill Knauss; Borut Cizman; Wensheng Guo; Eunice Franklin-Becker; Gerald Faich
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects.

Authors:  J M Robins; S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Causal mediation analyses with rank preserving models.

Authors:  Thomas R Ten Have; Marshall M Joffe; Kevin G Lynch; Gregory K Brown; Stephen A Maisto; Aaron T Beck
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Mediation analysis via potential outcomes models.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  A method for the analysis of randomized trials with compliance information: an application to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.

Authors:  S D Mark; J M Robins
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1993-04

7.  G-estimation of the effect of prophylaxis therapy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia on the survival of AIDS patients.

Authors:  J M Robins; D Blevins; G Ritter; M Wulfsohn
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Type of vascular access and mortality in U.S. hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  R K Dhingra; E W Young; T E Hulbert-Shearon; S F Leavey; F K Port
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Barriers to adequate delivery of hemodialysis.

Authors:  A R Sehgal; R J Snow; M E Singer; S B Amini; P B DeOreo; M R Silver; R D Cebul
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Improvements in dialysis patient mortality are associated with improvements in urea reduction ratio and hematocrit, 1999 to 2002.

Authors:  Robert A Wolfe; Tempie E Hulbert-Shearon; Valarie B Ashby; Sangeetha Mahadevan; Friedrich K Port
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  20 in total

1.  The relative performance of targeted maximum likelihood estimators.

Authors:  Kristin E Porter; Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan; Jasjeet S Sekhon
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Simple, efficient estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials using generalized linear models to leverage baseline variables.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Leveraging prognostic baseline variables to gain precision in randomized trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth Colantuoni; Michael Rosenblum
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Improved double-robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Andrea Rotnitzky; Quanhong Lei; Mariela Sued; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Targeted minimum loss based estimator that outperforms a given estimator.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  An alternative robust estimator of average treatment effect in causal inference.

Authors:  Jianxuan Liu; Yanyuan Ma; Lan Wang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Semiparametric tests for sufficient cause interaction.

Authors:  Stijn Vansteelandt; Tyler J VanderWeele; James M Robins
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.488

10.  Adaptive pair-matching in randomized trials with unbiased and efficient effect estimation.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.