Literature DB >> 29731541

Introduction to Double Robust Methods for Incomplete Data.

Shaun R Seaman1, Stijn Vansteelandt2,3.   

Abstract

Most methods for handling incomplete data can be broadly classified as inverse probability weighting (IPW) strategies or imputation strategies. The former model the occurrence of incomplete data; the latter, the distribution of the missing variables given observed variables in each missingness pattern. Imputation strategies are typically more efficient, but they can involve extrapolation, which is difficult to diagnose and can lead to large bias. Double robust (DR) methods combine the two approaches. They are typically more efficient than IPW and more robust to model misspecification than imputation. We give a formal introduction to DR estimation of the mean of a partially observed variable, before moving to more general incomplete-data scenarios. We review strategies to improve the performance of DR estimators under model misspecification, reveal connections between DR estimators for incomplete data and 'design-consistent' estimators used in sample surveys, and explain the value of double robustness when using flexible data-adaptive methods for IPW or imputation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  augmented inverse probability weighting; calibration estimators; data-adaptive methods; doubly robust; empirical likelihood; imputation; inverse probability weighting; missing data; primary – 62 Statistics; secondary – 62A01 Foundations and philosophical topics; semiparametric methods

Year:  2018        PMID: 29731541      PMCID: PMC5935236          DOI: 10.1214/18-STS647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Sci        ISSN: 0883-4237            Impact factor:   2.901


  15 in total

1.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Double robust and efficient estimation of a prognostic model for events in the presence of dependent censoring.

Authors:  Mireille E Schnitzer; Judith J Lok; Ronald J Bosch
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Doubly robust generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data.

Authors:  Shaun Seaman; Andrew Copas
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Comment: Demystifying Double Robustness: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Estimating a Population Mean from Incomplete Data.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.901

6.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Non-response models for the analysis of non-monotone ignorable missing data.

Authors:  J M Robins; R D Gill
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Confounder selection via penalized credible regions.

Authors:  Ander Wilson; Brian J Reich
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Improved doubly robust estimation when data are monotonely coarsened, with application to longitudinal studies with dropout.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Weihua Cao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data.

Authors:  Weihua Cao; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 2.445

View more
  3 in total

1.  ROBUST INFERENCE WHEN COMBINING INVERSE-PROBABILITY WEIGHTING AND MULTIPLE IMPUTATION TO ADDRESS MISSING DATA WITH APPLICATION TO AN ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS-BASED STUDY OF BARIATRIC SURGERY.

Authors:  Tanayott Thaweethai; David E Arterburn; Karen J Coleman; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.959

2.  AIPW: An R Package for Augmented Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimation of Average Causal Effects.

Authors:  Yongqi Zhong; Edward H Kennedy; Lisa M Bodnar; Ashley I Naimi
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 5.363

3.  Intergenerational effects of violence on women's perinatal wellbeing and infant health outcomes: evidence from a birth cohort study in Central Vietnam.

Authors:  Huyen Phuc Do; Philip R A Baker; Thang Van Vo; Aja Murray; Linda Murray; Sara Valdebenito; Manuel Eisner; Bach Xuan Tran; Michael P Dunne
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.