Literature DB >> 20628636

Simple, efficient estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials using generalized linear models to leverage baseline variables.

Michael Rosenblum1, Mark J van der Laan.   

Abstract

Models, such as logistic regression and Poisson regression models, are often used to estimate treatment effects in randomized trials. These models leverage information in variables collected before randomization, in order to obtain more precise estimates of treatment effects. However, there is the danger that model misspecification will lead to bias. We show that certain easy to compute, model-based estimators are asymptotically unbiased even when the working model used is arbitrarily misspecified. Furthermore, these estimators are locally efficient. As a special case of our main result, we consider a simple Poisson working model containing only main terms; in this case, we prove the maximum likelihood estimate of the coefficient corresponding to the treatment variable is an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the marginal log rate ratio, even when the working model is arbitrarily misspecified. This is the log-linear analog of ANCOVA for linear models. Our results demonstrate one application of targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Keywords:  Poisson regression; generalized linear model; misspecified model; targeted maximum likelihood

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628636      PMCID: PMC2898625          DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  12 in total

1.  Semiparametric estimation of treatment effect in a pretest-posttest study.

Authors:  Selene Leon; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Collaborative double robust targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Susan Gruber
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Asymptotic optimality of likelihood-based cross-validation.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan; Sandrine Dudoit; Sunduz Keles
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-22

4.  Empirical efficiency maximization: improved locally efficient covariate adjustment in randomized experiments and survival analysis.

Authors:  Daniel B Rubin; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Targeted maximum likelihood based causal inference: Part II.

Authors:  Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 0.968

6.  On the appropriateness of marginal models for repeated measurements in clinical trials.

Authors:  J K Lindsey; P Lambert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods.

Authors:  J Robins
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

8.  Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes: targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  K L Moore; M J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Susan E Assmann; Laura E Enos; Linda E Kasten
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Xiaomin Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  12 in total

1.  Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Leveraging prognostic baseline variables to gain precision in randomized trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth Colantuoni; Michael Rosenblum
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of the parameter of a marginal structural model.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  Improving massive experiments with threshold blocking.

Authors:  Michael J Higgins; Fredrik Sävje; Jasjeet S Sekhon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A new approach to hierarchical data analysis: Targeted maximum likelihood estimation for the causal effect of a cluster-level exposure.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Wenjing Zheng; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Adaptive pair-matching in randomized trials with unbiased and efficient effect estimation.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Using a network-based approach and targeted maximum likelihood estimation to evaluate the effect of adding pre-exposure prophylaxis to an ongoing test-and-treat trial.

Authors:  Laura Balzer; Patrick Staples; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Victor DeGruttola
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Effect of citalopram on agitation in Alzheimer disease: the CitAD randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Anton P Porsteinsson; Lea T Drye; Bruce G Pollock; D P Devanand; Constantine Frangakis; Zahinoor Ismail; Christopher Marano; Curtis L Meinert; Jacobo E Mintzer; Cynthia A Munro; Gregory Pelton; Peter V Rabins; Paul B Rosenberg; Lon S Schneider; David M Shade; Daniel Weintraub; Jerome Yesavage; Constantine G Lyketsos
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Estimation of treatment effects in matched-pair cluster randomized trials by calibrating covariate imbalance between clusters.

Authors:  Zhenke Wu; Constantine E Frangakis; Thomas A Louis; Daniel O Scharfstein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.