Literature DB >> 14969484

Semiparametric estimation of treatment effect in a pretest-posttest study.

Selene Leon1, Anastasios A Tsiatis, Marie Davidian.   

Abstract

Inference on treatment effects in a pretest-posttest study is a routine objective in medicine, public health, and other fields. A number of approaches have been advocated. We take a semiparametric perspective, making no assumptions about the distributions of baseline and posttest responses. By representing the situation in terms of counterfactual random variables, we exploit recent developments in the literature on missing data and causal inference, to derive the class of all consistent treatment effect estimators, identify the most efficient such estimator, and outline strategies for implementation of estimators that may improve on popular methods. We demonstrate the methods and their properties via simulation and by application to a data set from an HIV clinical trial.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14969484     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00120.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  18 in total

1.  On the covariate-adjusted estimation for an overall treatment difference with data from a randomized comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai; Lihui Zhao; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Simple, efficient estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials using generalized linear models to leverage baseline variables.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Sufficient dimension reduction via bayesian mixture modeling.

Authors:  Brian J Reich; Howard D Bondell; Lexin Li
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Semiparametric Estimation of Treatment Effect in a Pretest-Posttest Study with Missing Data.

Authors:  Marie Davidian; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Selene Leon
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.901

5.  Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  W Xiao; H H Zhang; W Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Estimating population treatment effects from a survey subsample.

Authors:  Kara E Rudolph; Iván Díaz; Michael Rosenblum; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Robust methods to improve efficiency and reduce bias in estimating survival curves in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Min Zhang
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Increasing the Efficiency of Prevention Trials by Incorporating Baseline Covariates.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Peter B Gilbert
Journal:  Stat Commun Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-01

9.  Joint covariate-adjusted score test statistics for recurrent events and a terminal event.

Authors:  Rui Song; Jianwen Cai
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.588

10.  Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Xiaomin Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.