Literature DB >> 27087478

Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching.

Laura B Balzer1, Maya L Petersen2, Mark J van der Laan2.   

Abstract

In cluster randomized trials, the study units usually are not a simple random sample from some clearly defined target population. Instead, the target population tends to be hypothetical or ill-defined, and the selection of study units tends to be systematic, driven by logistical and practical considerations. As a result, the population average treatment effect (PATE) may be neither well defined nor easily interpretable. In contrast, the sample average treatment effect (SATE) is the mean difference in the counterfactual outcomes for the study units. The sample parameter is easily interpretable and arguably the most relevant when the study units are not sampled from some specific super-population of interest. Furthermore, in most settings, the sample parameter will be estimated more efficiently than the population parameter. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to propose using targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) for estimation and inference of the sample effect in trials with and without pair-matching. We study the asymptotic and finite sample properties of the TMLE for the sample effect and provide a conservative variance estimator. Finite sample simulations illustrate the potential gains in precision and power from selecting the sample effect as the target of inference. This work is motivated by the Sustainable East Africa Research in Community Health (SEARCH) study, a pair-matched, community randomized trial to estimate the effect of population-based HIV testing and streamlined ART on the 5-year cumulative HIV incidence (NCT01864603). The proposed methodology will be used in the primary analysis for the SEARCH trial.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cluster randomized trials; pair-matching; population average treatment effect (PATE); sample average treatment effect (SATE); targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27087478      PMCID: PMC4965321          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  18 in total

1.  Optimal multivariate matching before randomization.

Authors:  Robert Greevy; Bo Lu; Jeffrey H Silber; Paul Rosenbaum
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Simple, efficient estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials using generalized linear models to leverage baseline variables.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 0.968

3.  Developments in cluster randomized trials and Statistics in Medicine.

Authors:  M J Campbell; A Donner; N Klar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A targeted maximum likelihood estimator of a causal effect on a bounded continuous outcome.

Authors:  Susan Gruber; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 0.968

5.  Implementation of G-computation on a simulated data set: demonstration of a causal inference technique.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Sherri Rose; Kathleen M Mortimer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The efficiency of the matched-pairs design of the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation (COMMIT).

Authors:  L S Freedman; M H Gail; S B Green; D K Corle
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1997-04

7.  The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart; Stephen R Cole; Catherine P Bradshaw; Philip J Leaf
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 2.483

8.  Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes: targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

Authors:  K L Moore; M J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Xiaomin Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Inverse probability weighting for covariate adjustment in randomized studies.

Authors:  Changyu Shen; Xiaochun Li; Lingling Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  8 in total

1.  Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  "All Generalizations Are Dangerous, Even This One."-Alexandre Dumas.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  Review of Recent Methodological Developments in Group-Randomized Trials: Part 2-Analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Turner; Melanie Prague; John A Gallis; Fan Li; David M Murray
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Using a network-based approach and targeted maximum likelihood estimation to evaluate the effect of adding pre-exposure prophylaxis to an ongoing test-and-treat trial.

Authors:  Laura Balzer; Patrick Staples; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Victor DeGruttola
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of causal effects with interference: A simulation study.

Authors:  Paul N Zivich; Michael G Hudgens; Maurice A Brookhart; James Moody; David J Weber; Allison E Aiello
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Selective inference for effect modification via the lasso.

Authors:  Qingyuan Zhao; Dylan S Small; Ashkan Ertefaie
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.933

7.  TARGETED SEQUENTIAL DESIGN FOR TARGETED LEARNING INFERENCE OF THE OPTIMAL TREATMENT RULE AND ITS MEAN REWARD.

Authors:  Antoine Chambaz; Wenjing Zheng; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.028

8.  Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on child development in rural Kenya (WASH Benefits Kenya): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christine P Stewart; Patricia Kariger; Lia Fernald; Amy J Pickering; Charles D Arnold; Benjamin F Arnold; Alan E Hubbard; Holly N Dentz; Audrie Lin; Theodora J Meerkerk; Erin Milner; Jenna Swarthout; John M Colford; Clair Null
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.