Literature DB >> 18985634

Covariate adjustment in randomized trials with binary outcomes: targeted maximum likelihood estimation.

K L Moore1, M J van der Laan.   

Abstract

Covariate adjustment using linear models for continuous outcomes in randomized trials has been shown to increase efficiency and power over the unadjusted method in estimating the marginal effect of treatment. However, for binary outcomes, investigators generally rely on the unadjusted estimate as the literature indicates that covariate-adjusted estimates based on the logistic regression models are less efficient. The crucial step that has been missing when adjusting for covariates is that one must integrate/average the adjusted estimate over those covariates in order to obtain the marginal effect. We apply the method of targeted maximum likelihood estimation (tMLE) to obtain estimators for the marginal effect using covariate adjustment for binary outcomes. We show that the covariate adjustment in randomized trials using the logistic regression models can be mapped, by averaging over the covariate(s), to obtain a fully robust and efficient estimator of the marginal effect, which equals a targeted maximum likelihood estimator. This tMLE is obtained by simply adding a clever covariate to a fixed initial regression. We present simulation studies that demonstrate that this tMLE increases efficiency and power over the unadjusted method, particularly for smaller sample sizes, even when the regression model is mis-specified. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18985634      PMCID: PMC2857590          DOI: 10.1002/sim.3445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  Randomised trial of home-based psychosocial nursing intervention for patients recovering from myocardial infarction.

Authors:  N Frasure-Smith; F Lespérance; R H Prince; P Verrier; R A Garber; M Juneau; C Wolfson; M G Bourassa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements.

Authors:  Adrián V Hernández; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Dik F Habbema
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models.

Authors:  Heejung Bang; James M Robins
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Treatment of cryptococcal meningitis associated with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group and AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  C M van der Horst; M S Saag; G A Cloud; R J Hamill; J R Graybill; J D Sobel; P C Johnson; C U Tuazon; T Kerkering; B L Moskovitz; W G Powderly; W E Dismukes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-07-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A graphical approach to the identification and estimation of causal parameters in mortality studies with sustained exposure periods.

Authors:  J Robins
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  Supplemental perioperative oxygen and the risk of surgical wound infection: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  F Javier Belda; Luciano Aguilera; José García de la Asunción; Javier Alberti; Rosario Vicente; Lucía Ferrándiz; Rafael Rodríguez; Roque Company; Daniel I Sessler; Gerardo Aguilar; Stephanie García Botello; Rafael Ortí
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Susan E Assmann; Laura E Enos; Linda E Kasten
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Effect of mechanical ventilator weaning protocols on respiratory outcomes in infants and children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Adrienne G Randolph; David Wypij; Shekhar T Venkataraman; James H Hanson; Rainer G Gedeit; Kathleen L Meert; Peter M Luckett; Peter Forbes; Michelle Lilley; John Thompson; Ira M Cheifetz; Patricia Hibberd; Randall Wetzel; Peter N Cox; John H Arnold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach.

Authors:  Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Xiaomin Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Improving efficiency of inferences in randomized clinical trials using auxiliary covariates.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 1.701

View more
  41 in total

1.  Simple, efficient estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials using generalized linear models to leverage baseline variables.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Adaptive pre-specification in randomized trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Mark J van der Laan; Maya L Petersen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Leveraging prognostic baseline variables to gain precision in randomized trials.

Authors:  Elizabeth Colantuoni; Michael Rosenblum
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Robust extraction of covariate information to improve estimation efficiency in randomized trials.

Authors:  Kelly L Moore; Romain Neugebauer; Thamban Valappil; Mark J Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Lackner; James Jaccard; Laurie Keefer; Darren M Brenner; Rebecca S Firth; Gregory D Gudleski; Frank A Hamilton; Leonard A Katz; Susan S Krasner; Chang-Xing Ma; Christopher D Radziwon; Michael D Sitrin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of the parameter of a marginal structural model.

Authors:  Michael Rosenblum; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 0.968

7.  Locally efficient estimation of marginal treatment effects when outcomes are correlated: is the prize worth the chase?

Authors:  Alisa Stephens; Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen; Victor De Gruttola
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.

Authors:  Menglan Pang; Tibor Schuster; Kristian B Filion; Mireille E Schnitzer; Maria Eberg; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 0.968

9.  On adjustment for auxiliary covariates in additive hazard models for the analysis of randomized experiments.

Authors:  S Vansteelandt; T Martinussen; E Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 2.445

10.  Improved precision in the analysis of randomized trials with survival outcomes, without assuming proportional hazards.

Authors:  Iván Díaz; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Daniel F Hanley; Michael Rosenblum
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 1.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.