| Literature DB >> 20617167 |
Jonathan H Epstein1, Phenix-Lan Quan, Thomas Briese, Craig Street, Omar Jabado, Sean Conlan, Shahneaz Ali Khan, Dawn Verdugo, M Jahangir Hossain, Stephen K Hutchison, Michael Egholm, Stephen P Luby, Peter Daszak, W Ian Lipkin.
Abstract
Bats are reservoirs for a wide range of zoonotic agents including lyssa-, henipah-, SARS-like corona-, Marburg-, Ebola-, and astroviruses. In an effort to survey for the presence of other infectious agents, known and unknown, we screened sera from 16 Pteropus giganteus bats from Faridpur, Bangladesh, using high-throughput pyrosequencing. Sequence analyses indicated the presence of a previously undescribed virus that has approximately 50% identity at the amino acid level to GB virus A and C (GBV-A and -C). Viral nucleic acid was present in 5 of 98 sera (5%) from a single colony of free-ranging bats. Infection was not associated with evidence of hepatitis or hepatic dysfunction. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that this first GBV-like flavivirus reported in bats constitutes a distinct species within the Flaviviridae family and is ancestral to the GBV-A and -C virus clades.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20617167 PMCID: PMC2895649 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 6.823
Figure 1Map showing the location of the bat colony in Faridpur district, Bangladesh from which GBV-D was identified.
Percent sequence similarity between GBV-D (bat-68), -A, -C, and hepaciviruses.
| nt | GBV-D | GBV-C | GBV-A | GBV-B | HCV-1 |
| GBV-D | 48 | 46 | 39 | 41 | |
| GBV-C | 41 | 55 | 41 | 44 | |
| GBV-A | 39 | 47 | 37 | 38 | |
| GBV-B | 25 | 24 | 24 | 41 | |
| HVC-1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 27 |
*Sequence similarity at nt level in upper right, and at aa level in lower left portion of the table.
Figure 2Sliding window similarity analysis between GBV-D and other GBV and hepaciviruses (amino acid sequence; window, 160; step, 20).
Figure 3Genomic organization of GBV-D, a novel flavivirus identified in the sera of frugivorous bats in Bangladesh.
Arrows, glycosylation sites; solid diamond, active center sites H921, E1011, and C1032 in the autocatalytic NS2/NS3 endoprotease domain; triangle, catalytic triad H1123, D1147, S1204 of NS3 serine protease; rectangle, NS3 helicase and DEAD-like helicase motifs; open diamond, zinc finger motif; and NS5 polymarase motifs A (T2744VDAICFDSCIT), B (R2802ASGVLTTSSSNCISSFLKVSAAC), C (F2835LIHGDDVMII), D (L2876DTAQSCSA),and E (H2900YFLSTDFR) motifs.
Figure 4Phylogenetic relationship of GBV-D to other GBV and hepaciviruses.
GBV-D amino acid sequences for A: NS5B, B: NS3, and C: the polyprotein (PPT) were analyzed in comparison to representative sequences of GBV-A, -B, -C and hepatitis C viruses. GenBank accession numbers for the respective sequences are indicated. Entebbe bat virus was used as an outgroup; distance in substitutions per site is indicated by scale bars; percent bootstrap support for values greater than 85% is indicated at respective nodes.
Liver function values from Pteropus giganteus bats.
| T.Prot (g/dL) | Alb (g/dL) | Glob | A∶G | T. Chol (mg/dL) | T. Bili (mg/dL) | Alk Phos | ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | LDH (mg/dL) | |
| Ref Range (human) | 64.0–82.0 | 34–50 | 23–35 | 1.1–1.8 | 3.6–6.3 | .01–19 | 30–120 | .01–41 | .01–38 | 9–40 | 135–225 |
| Ref Range ( | 65–84 | 30–41 | 0–2.3 | 1.2–84.6 | 30.2–141.0 | ||||||
| Bat ID | |||||||||||
| 1 | 86 | 50.7 | 35.3 | 1.44 | 1.65 | 1.8 | 1572..4 | 13.9 | 67.6 | 87.90 | 53.4 |
| 3 | 79.7 | 49.4 | 30.3 | 1.63 | 2.74 | 2.1 | 605.7 | 20.2 | 67.4 | 49.20 | 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21 | 76 | 48 | 28 | 1.71 | 1.06 | 1.2 | 794.9 | 23.8 | 83.7 | 35.70 | 244.5 |
| 23 | 71.5 | 46.2 | 25.3 | 1.83 | 1.49 | 1.7 | 1650 | 12 | 115.1 | 102.00 | 96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 36 | 89.9 | 51 | 38.9 | 1.31 | 1.22 | 2.5 | 580.4 | 11.1 | 109.4 | 69.00 | 114.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 | 70.4 | 43.3 | 27.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 328.7 | 20.5 | 77.8 | 31.00 | 82.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 73 | 82.4 | 46.1 | 36.3 | 1.27 | 1.17 | 1.8 | 958.8 | 19.7 | 185.4 | 37.00 | 859.4 |
| 82 | 72.3 | 43.8 | 28.5 | 1.54 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 458.4 | 22.1 | 82.1 | 48.50 | 350.3 |
| 84 | 82.6 | 46.2 | 36.4 | 1.27 | 1.43 | 2.7 | 923.6 | 22.9 | 107.6 | 46.40 | 176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 96 | 76.5 | 46.8 | 29.7 | 1.58 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 574.6 | 20.9 | 79.4 | 101.80 | 203.7 |
| Mean uninfected | 78.73 | 47.15 | 31.58 | 1.518 | 1.226 | 1.81 | 763.9 | 18.71 | 97.55 | 60.85 | 227.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| STdv uninfected | 6.52 | 2.63 | 4.71 | 0.19 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 391.61 | 4.62 | 35.31 | 27.40 | 239.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No indication of hepatitis or impaired liver function was observed; no significant differences between mean values for infected (bold) or non-infected bats were apparent.
The following parameters were analyzed: Total Protein (T. Prot); Albumin (Alb), Globulin (Glob), Alb∶Glob ratio, Total Cholesterol (T. Chol); Total Bilirubin (T. Bili); Akaline Phosphatase (Alk. Phos); Alanine Transferase (ALT); Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST); Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT) and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH).