| Literature DB >> 16494748 |
Mandeep S Chadha1, James A Comer, Luis Lowe, Paul A Rota, Pierre E Rollin, William J Bellini, Thomas G Ksiazek, Akhilesh Mishra.
Abstract
During January and February 2001, an outbreak of febrile illness associated with altered sensorium was observed in Siliguri, West Bengal, India. Laboratory investigations at the time of the outbreak did not identify an infectious agent. Because Siliguri is in close proximity to Bangladesh, where outbreaks of Nipah virus (NiV) infection were recently described, clinical material obtained during the Siliguri outbreak was retrospectively analyzed for evidence of NiV infection. NiV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies were detected in 9 of 18 patients. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays detected RNA from NiV in urine samples from 5 patients. Sequence analysis confirmed that the PCR products were derived from NiV RNA and suggested that the NiV from Siliguri was more closely related to NiV isolates from Bangladesh than to NiV isolates from Malaysia. NiV infection has not been previously detected in India.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16494748 PMCID: PMC3373078 DOI: 10.3201/eid1202.051247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Epidemic curve of outbreak of febrile encephalitis in Siliguri, India, January though February 2001, by number of hospital-associated and nonhospital-associated cases and deaths. The vertical, black arrow indicates when barrier methods were introduced for case management.
Figure 2Sequence of events in the Siliguri (SD) outbreak.
Serologic and PCR test results for clinical material from patients with encephalitis, Siliguri, India*
| Patient no. | Days after onset of fever | Serology† | PCR (urine) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgM | IgG | N gene | M gene | ||
| 1 | 10 | + | + | + | NA |
| 2 | 5 | + | + | NA | |
| 3 | 9 | + | + | + | NA |
| 4 | 10 | + | + | NA | NA |
| 5 | 9 | – | – | NA | NA |
| 6 | 10 | – | – | + | + |
| 7 | 3 | – | – | NA | NA |
| 8 | 7 | – | – | NA | NA |
| 9 | Unknown | – | – | NA | NA |
| 10 | 1 | – | + | NA | NA |
| 11 | 3 | + | + | NA | NA |
| 12 | 5 | + | + | + | + |
| 13 | 7 | – | – | NA | NA |
| 14 | 6 | + | + | NA | NA |
| 15 | 3 | + | + | NA | NA |
| 16 | 8 | – | – | NA | NA |
| 17 | 8 | + | + | + | + |
| 18 | 2 | NA† | NA | – | – |
*PCR, polymerase chain reaction; IgM, immunoglobulin M; IgG, immunoglobulin G; NA, no sample available. †Nipah virus–specific IgM or IgM by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Figure 3Comparison of partial N-gene nucleotide sequences obtained from the Siliguri specimens (by patient number, see Table) to sequences obtained from Nipah virus isolates from Bangladesh (AY988601) and Malaysia (AF212302, AF376747). Letters indicate positions that differ from the reference sequence on the top line, Nipah-malaysia-1. Dots indicate nucleotide identity. R indicates A or G.
Figure 4A) Comparison of partial M-gene nucleotide sequences of Siliguri specimens to Nipah virus isolates from Bangladesh (Bangladesh-1:AY988601, Bangladesh-2:unpublished) and Malaysia (AF212302). Letters indicate positions that differ from the reference sequence on the top line, Nipah-Malaysia. Dots indicate nucleotide identity. B) Phylogenetic tree based on the sequence alignment shown in panel A.