Literature DB >> 10395892

Initiation of translation in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

M Kozak1.   

Abstract

The mechanisms whereby ribosomes engage a messenger RNA and select the start site for translation differ between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Initiation sites in polycistronic prokaryotic mRNAs are usually selected via base pairing with ribosomal RNA. That straightforward mechanism is made complicated and interesting by cis- and trans-acting elements employed to regulate translation. Initiation sites in eukaryotic mRNAs are reached via a scanning mechanism which predicts that translation should start at the AUG codon nearest the 5' end of the mRNA. Interest has focused on mechanisms that occasionally allow escape from this first-AUG rule. With natural mRNAs, three escape mechanisms - context-dependent leaky scanning, reinitiation, and possibly direct internal initiation - allow access to AUG codons which, although not first, are still close to the 5' end of the mRNA. This constraint on the initiation step of translation in eukaryotes dictates the location of transcriptional promoters and may have contributed to the evolution of splicing.The binding of Met-tRNA to ribosomes is mediated by a GTP-binding protein in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, but the more complex structure of the eukaryotic factor (eIF-2) and its association with other proteins underlie some aspects of initiation unique to eukaryotes. Modulation of GTP hydrolysis by eIF-2 is important during the scanning phase of initiation, while modulating the release of GDP from eIF-2 is a key mechanism for regulating translation in eukaryotes. Our understanding of how some other protein factors participate in the initiation phase of translation is in flux. Genetic tests suggest that some proteins conventionally counted as eukaryotic initiation factors may not be required for translation, while other tests have uncovered interesting new candidates. Some popular ideas about the initiation pathway are predicated on static interactions between isolated factors and mRNA. The need for functional testing of these complexes is discussed. Interspersed with these theoretical topics are some practical points concerning the interpretation of cDNA sequences and the use of in vitro translation systems. Some human diseases resulting from defects in the initiation step of translation are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10395892     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00210-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  439 in total

1.  Expression of cmg1, an exo-beta-1,3-glucanase gene from Coniothyrium minitans, increases during sclerotial parasitism.

Authors:  G Giczey; Z Kerényi; L Fülöp; L Hornok
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Mutational analysis of mammalian translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5): role of interaction between the beta subunit of eIF2 and eIF5 in eIF5 function in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  S Das; U Maitra
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Chicken Y-box proteins chk-YB-1b and chk-YB-2 repress translation by sequence-specific interaction with single-stranded RNA.

Authors:  S K Swamynathan; A Nambiar; R V Guntaka
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Expression of a nonmyristylated variant of the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A during male germ-cell development.

Authors:  J L Desseyn; K A Burton; G S McKnight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A 9-nt segment of a cellular mRNA can function as an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and when present in linked multiple copies greatly enhances IRES activity.

Authors:  S A Chappell; G M Edelman; V P Mauro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Identification of two short internal ribosome entry sites selected from libraries of random oligonucleotides.

Authors:  G C Owens; S A Chappell; V P Mauro; G M Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  New ways of initiating translation in eukaryotes?

Authors:  M Kozak
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Endogenous regulators of G protein signaling proteins regulate presynaptic inhibition at rat hippocampal synapses.

Authors:  H Chen; N A Lambert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Upstream open reading frames as regulators of mRNA translation.

Authors:  D R Morris; A P Geballe
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Effect of intercistronic length on internal ribosome entry site (IRES) efficiency in bicistronic mRNA.

Authors:  J Attal; M C Theron; C Puissant; L M Houdebine
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1999
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.