Literature DB >> 20597850

Buckley-James boosting for survival analysis with high-dimensional biomarker data.

Zhu Wang1, C Y Wang.   

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in predicting patients' survival after therapy by investigating gene expression microarray data. In the regression and classification models with high-dimensional genomic data, boosting has been successfully applied to build accurate predictive models and conduct variable selection simultaneously. We propose the Buckley-James boosting for the semiparametric accelerated failure time models with right censored survival data, which can be used to predict survival of future patients using the high-dimensional genomic data. In the spirit of adaptive LASSO, twin boosting is also incorporated to fit more sparse models. The proposed methods have a unified approach to fit linear models, non-linear effects models with possible interactions. The methods can perform variable selection and parameter estimation simultaneously. The proposed methods are evaluated by simulations and applied to a recent microarray gene expression data set for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma under the current gold standard therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20597850      PMCID: PMC2904263          DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1544-6115


  36 in total

1.  Genes, environment, and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Charles F Sing; Jari H Stengård; Sharon L R Kardia
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  Regression approaches for microarray data analysis.

Authors:  Mark R Segal; Kam D Dahlquist; Bruce R Conklin
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Boosting method for nonlinear transformation models with censored survival data.

Authors:  Wenbin Lu; Lexin Li
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Doubly penalized buckley-james method for survival data with high-dimensional covariates.

Authors:  Sijian Wang; Bin Nan; Ji Zhu; David G Beer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Molecular outcome prediction in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Ash A Alizadeh; Andrew J Gentles; Izidore S Lossos; Ronald Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Genetic and epigenetic silencing of SCARA5 may contribute to human hepatocellular carcinoma by activating FAK signaling.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Da-Li Zheng; Feng-Song Qin; Na Cheng; Hui Chen; Bing-Bing Wan; Yu-Ping Wang; Hua-Sheng Xiao; Ze-Guang Han
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Empirical study of supervised gene screening.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Supervised harvesting of expression trees.

Authors:  T Hastie; R Tibshirani; D Botstein; P Brown
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-01-10       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Methodological issues in detecting gene-gene interactions in breast cancer susceptibility: a population-based study in Ontario.

Authors:  Laurent Briollais; Yuanyuan Wang; Isaac Rajendram; Venus Onay; Ellen Shi; Julia Knight; Hilmi Ozcelik
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Flexible boosting of accelerated failure time models.

Authors:  Matthias Schmid; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  8 in total

1.  Lasso regularization for left-censored Gaussian outcome and high-dimensional predictors.

Authors:  Perrine Soret; Marta Avalos; Linda Wittkop; Daniel Commenges; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Identification of breast cancer prognosis markers using integrative sparse boosting.

Authors:  S Ma; J Huang; Y Xie; N Yi
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  A Selective Review on Random Survival Forests for High Dimensional Data.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Gang Li
Journal:  Quant Biosci       Date:  2017

4.  A Model-Free Machine Learning Method for Risk Classification and Survival Probability Prediction.

Authors:  Yuan Geng; Wenbin Lu; Hao Helen Zhang
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2014

5.  Sparse boosting for high-dimensional survival data with varying coefficients.

Authors:  Mu Yue; Jialiang Li; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  eBreCaP: extreme learning-based model for breast cancer survival prediction.

Authors:  Arwinder Dhillon; Ashima Singh
Journal:  IET Syst Biol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.615

7.  Cancer survival analysis using semi-supervised learning method based on Cox and AFT models with L1/2 regularization.

Authors:  Yong Liang; Hua Chai; Xiao-Ying Liu; Zong-Ben Xu; Hai Zhang; Kwong-Sak Leung
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.063

8.  Random rotation survival forest for high dimensional censored data.

Authors:  Lifeng Zhou; Hong Wang; Qingsong Xu
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.