Literature DB >> 30514234

Lasso regularization for left-censored Gaussian outcome and high-dimensional predictors.

Perrine Soret1,2,3, Marta Avalos4,5, Linda Wittkop1,2,6, Daniel Commenges1,2, Rodolphe Thiébaut1,2,3,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biological assays for the quantification of markers may suffer from a lack of sensitivity and thus from an analytical detection limit. This is the case of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) viral load. Below this threshold the exact value is unknown and values are consequently left-censored. Statistical methods have been proposed to deal with left-censoring but few are adapted in the context of high-dimensional data.
METHODS: We propose to reverse the Buckley-James least squares algorithm to handle left-censored data enhanced with a Lasso regularization to accommodate high-dimensional predictors. We present a Lasso-regularized Buckley-James least squares method with both non-parametric imputation using Kaplan-Meier and parametric imputation based on the Gaussian distribution, which is typically assumed for HIV viral load data after logarithmic transformation. Cross-validation for parameter-tuning is based on an appropriate loss function that takes into account the different contributions of censored and uncensored observations. We specify how these techniques can be easily implemented using available R packages. The Lasso-regularized Buckley-James least square method was compared to simple imputation strategies to predict the response to antiretroviral therapy measured by HIV viral load according to the HIV genotypic mutations. We used a dataset composed of several clinical trials and cohorts from the Forum for Collaborative HIV Research (HIV Med. 2008;7:27-40). The proposed methods were also assessed on simulated data mimicking the observed data.
RESULTS: Approaches accounting for left-censoring outperformed simple imputation methods in a high-dimensional setting. The Gaussian Buckley-James method with cross-validation based on the appropriate loss function showed the lowest prediction error on simulated data and, using real data, the most valid results according to the current literature on HIV mutations.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed approach deals with high-dimensional predictors and left-censored outcomes and has shown its interest for predicting HIV viral load according to HIV mutations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buckley-James least squares procedure; Cross-sectional studies; Drug resistance; HIV genotypic mutations; HIV viral load; Limit of detection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30514234      PMCID: PMC6280495          DOI: 10.1186/s12874-018-0609-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol        ISSN: 1471-2288            Impact factor:   4.615


  52 in total

Review 1.  More than obvious: better methods for interpreting nondetect data.

Authors:  Dennis R Helsel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Longitudinal analysis of quantitative virologic measures in human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects with > or = 400 CD4 lymphocytes: implications for applying measurements to individual patients. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Group.

Authors:  W B Paxton; R W Coombs; M J McElrath; M C Keefer; J Hughes; F Sinangil; D Chernoff; L Demeter; B Williams; L Corey
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Regression models for censored serological data.

Authors:  George Kafatos; Nick Andrews; Kevin J McConway; Paddy Farrington
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Accommodating measurements below a limit of detection: a novel application of Cox regression.

Authors:  Gregg E Dinse; Todd A Jusko; Lindsey A Ho; Kaushik Annam; Barry I Graubard; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Frederick W Miller; Brenda W Gillespie; Clarice R Weinberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

6.  Multiple imputation for left-censored biomarker data based on Gibbs sampling method.

Authors:  MinJae Lee; Lan Kong; Lisa Weissfeld
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Comparison of models for analyzing two-group, cross-sectional data with a Gaussian outcome subject to a detection limit.

Authors:  Ryan E Wiegand; Charles E Rose; John M Karon
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  The individualized genetic barrier predicts treatment response in a large cohort of HIV-1 infected patients.

Authors:  Niko Beerenwinkel; Hesam Montazeri; Heike Schuhmacher; Patrick Knupfer; Viktor von Wyl; Hansjakob Furrer; Manuel Battegay; Bernard Hirschel; Matthias Cavassini; Pietro Vernazza; Enos Bernasconi; Sabine Yerly; Jürg Böni; Thomas Klimkait; Cristina Cellerai; Huldrych F Günthard
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Deep learning predictions of survival based on MRI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Hannelore K van der Burgh; Ruben Schmidt; Henk-Jan Westeneng; Marcel A de Reus; Leonard H van den Berg; Martijn P van den Heuvel
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 4.881

10.  Alternative methods to analyse the impact of HIV mutations on virological response to antiviral therapy.

Authors:  Linda Wittkop; Daniel Commenges; Isabelle Pellegrin; Dominique Breilh; Didier Neau; Denis Lacoste; Jean-Luc Pellegrin; Geneviève Chêne; François Dabis; Rodolphe Thiébaut
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  A semiparametric modeling approach for analyzing clinical biomarkers restricted to limits of detection.

Authors:  Sandipan Dutta; Susan Halabi
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 1.894

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.