Literature DB >> 22344268

Identification of breast cancer prognosis markers using integrative sparse boosting.

S Ma1, J Huang, Y Xie, N Yi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In breast cancer research, it is important to identify genomic markers associated with prognosis. Multiple microarray gene expression profiling studies have been conducted, searching for prognosis markers. Genomic markers identified from the analysis of single datasets often suffer a lack of reproducibility because of small sample sizes. Integrative analysis of data from multiple independent studies has a larger sample size and may provide a cost-effective solution.
METHODS: We collect four breast cancer prognosis studies with gene expression measurements. An accelerated failure time (AFT) model with an unknown error distribution is adopted to describe survival. An integrative sparse boosting approach is employed for marker selection. The proposed model and boosting approach can effectively accommodate heterogeneity across multiple studies and identify genes with consistent effects.
RESULTS: Simulation study shows that the proposed approach outperforms alternatives including meta-analysis and intensity approaches by identifying the majority or all of the true positives, while having a low false positive rate. In the analysis of breast cancer data, 44 genes are identified as associated with prognosis. Many of the identified genes have been previously suggested as associated with tumorigenesis and cancer prognosis. The identified genes and corresponding predicted risk scores differ from those using alternative approaches. Monte Carlo-based prediction evaluation suggests that the proposed approach has the best prediction performance.
CONCLUSIONS: Integrative analysis may provide an effective way of identifying breast cancer prognosis markers. Markers identified using the integrative sparse boosting analysis have sound biological implications and satisfactory prediction performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22344268      PMCID: PMC3598607          DOI: 10.3414/ME11-02-0019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  27 in total

1.  Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression.

Authors:  Daniel R Rhodes; Jianjun Yu; K Shanker; Nandan Deshpande; Radhika Varambally; Debashis Ghosh; Terrence Barrette; Akhilesh Pandey; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The accelerated failure time model: a useful alternative to the Cox regression model in survival analysis.

Authors:  L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Proteomics analysis of conditioned media from three breast cancer cell lines: a mine for biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Vathany Kulasingam; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Identification of MMP-1 as a putative breast cancer predictive marker by global gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Indira Poola; Robert L DeWitty; Josephine J Marshalleck; Rakesh Bhatnagar; Jessy Abraham; LaSalle D Leffall
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Gene expression profiling of breast cancer.

Authors:  Maggie C U Cheang; Matt van de Rijn; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 23.472

6.  Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis.

Authors:  Christos Sotiriou; Pratyaksha Wirapati; Sherene Loi; Adrian Harris; Steve Fox; Johanna Smeds; Hans Nordgren; Pierre Farmer; Viviane Praz; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Christine Desmedt; Denis Larsimont; Fatima Cardoso; Hans Peterse; Dimitry Nuyten; Marc Buyse; Marc J Van de Vijver; Jonas Bergh; Martine Piccart; Mauro Delorenzi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Predicting patient survival from microarray data by accelerated failure time modeling using partial least squares and LASSO.

Authors:  Susmita Datta; Jennifer Le-Rademacher; Somnath Datta
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Novel markers for differentiation of lobular and ductal invasive breast carcinomas by laser microdissection and microarray analysis.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Jan Bouchal; Karl Baumforth; Wenbin Wei; Marta Dziechciarkova; Jiri Ehrmann; Jiri Klein; Eduard Fridman; Jozef Skarda; Josef Srovnal; Marian Hajduch; Paul Murray; Zdenek Kolar
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Gene expression profiling and histopathological characterization of triple-negative/basal-like breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Bas Kreike; Marieke van Kouwenhove; Hugo Horlings; Britta Weigelt; Hans Peterse; Harry Bartelink; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Flexible boosting of accelerated failure time models.

Authors:  Matthias Schmid; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  From bed to bench: bridging from informatics practice to theory: an exploratory analysis.

Authors:  R Haux; C U Lehmann
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  The Evaluation of WBP2NL-Related Genes Expression in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Seyedmehdi Nourashrafeddin; Mahmoud Aarabi; Mohammad Hosein Modarressi; Marveh Rahmati; Mohammad Nouri
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Gene network-based cancer prognosis analysis with sparse boosting.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Yuan Huang; Jian Huang; Kuangnan Fang
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.588

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.