Literature DB >> 20585754

Postoperative evaluation of tibial footprint and tunnels characteristics after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers.

Amit Sahasrabudhe1, Pascal Christel, Francois Anne, David Appleby, Georges Basdekis.   

Abstract

Following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts, 38 consecutive patients were evaluated with high-speed three-dimensional computed tomography. Scans were performed within 3 days following surgery. The length and width of the reconstructed ACL footprint were measured on axial images. Then, 3D images were converted into 2D with radiologic density for measurement purposes. Tunnel orientation was measured on AP and lateral views. In the sagittal plane, the center of the anteromedial (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) tibial attachment positions was calculated as the ratio between the geometric insertion sites with respect to the sagittal diameter of the tibia. In addition, the length from the anterior tibial plateau to the retro-eminence ridge was measured; the relationship of this line with the centers of the AM and PL tunnels was then measured. The AP length of the reconstructed footprint was 17.1 mm ± 1.9 mm and the width 7.3 mm ± 1.2 m. The distance from retro-eminence ridge to center of AM tunnel was 18.8 mm ± 2.8 mm, and the distance from RER to center of PL tunnel was 8.7 mm ± 2.6 mm. The distance between tunnels center was 10.1 mm ± 1.7 mm. There were no significant differences between the intra- and inter-observer measurements. The bone bridge thickness was 2.1 mm ± 0.8 mm. In the sagittal plane, the centers of the tunnel apertures were located at 35.7% ± 6.7% and 53.7% ± 6.8% of the tibia diameter for the AMB and PLB, respectively. The surface areas of the tunnel apertures were 46.3 mm(2) ± 4.4 mm(2) and 36.3 mm(2) ± 4.0 mm(2) for the AM and PL tunnels, respectively. The total surface area occupied by both tunnels was 82.6 mm(2) ± 7.0 mm(2). In the coronal plane, tunnel orientation showed the AM tunnel was more vertical than the PL tunnel with a 10° divergence (14.8° vs. 24.1°). In the sagittal plane, both tunnels were almost parallel (29.9° and 25.4° for the AM and PL tunnels, respectively). When using anatomic aimers, the morphometric parameters of the reconstructed tibial footprint in terms of length and distances to the surrounding bony landmarks were similar to the native ACL tibial footprint. However, the native footprint width was not restored, and the surface area of the two tunnel apertures was in the lower range of the published values for the native footprint area.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20585754     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1189-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy and biomechanics of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Michael Dienst; Robert T Burks; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

Authors:  Timo Järvelä
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers.

Authors:  Pascal Christel; Amit Sahasrabudhe; Georges Basdekis
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Michael Elias Hantes; Vasilios C Zachos; Athanasios Liantsis; Aaron Venouziou; Apostolos H Karantanas; Konstantinos N Malizos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Samuel Park; Steven R Jackson; David R McAllister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints.

Authors:  Harehiko Tsukada; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Eiichi Tsuda; Akira Fukuda; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  S P Arnoczky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Masaaki Takahashi; Mitsuhito Doi; Masashi Abe; Daisuke Suzuki; Akira Nagano
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Thomas Ellert; Stefan Metz; Juergen Metz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Radiologic evaluation of femoral and tibial tunnels created with the transtibial tunnel technique for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eiji Kondo; Kazunori Yasuda; Hiroki Ichiyama; Chinatsu Azuma; Harukazu Tohyama
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  9 in total

1.  Restoration of the tibial ACL footprint area and geometry using the Modified Insertion Site Table.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Peter Schuhmacher
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Evaluation of the intercondylar roof impingement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3D-CT.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Takashi Horaguchi; Tatsuya Kubomura; Yusuke Morimoto; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Transparent 3-dimensional CT in evaluation of femoral bone tunnel communication after ACL double-bundle reconstruction: comparison between outside-in and transportal technique.

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Gen Yoshida; Yo Hara; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The reversal.

Authors:  Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Relationship between thickness of the anteromedial bundle and thickness of the posterolateral bundle in the normal ACL.

Authors:  Michihiro Katouda; Takashi Soejima; Tomonoshin Kanazawa; Kousuke Tabuchi; Kouichi Yamaki; Kensei Nagata
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The concept of complete footprint restoration with guidelines for single- and double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anatomic attachment of the ACL. Comparison between radiological and CT analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Eugène Ciobanu; Philippe Clavert; Jean-Henri Jaeger; Jean-Luc Kahn; Jean-François Kempf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Evaluation of ACL mid-substance cross-sectional area for reconstructed autograft selection.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Hiroshi Yorifuji; Shin Aizawa; Yuki Tajika; Tohru Murakami; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Simulated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  Makoto Nishimori; Masataka Deie; Nobuo Adachi; Atsuo Nakamae; Minoru Ishifuro; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.