Literature DB >> 23842801

Transparent 3-dimensional CT in evaluation of femoral bone tunnel communication after ACL double-bundle reconstruction: comparison between outside-in and transportal technique.

Tomohiro Tomihara1, Gen Yoshida, Yo Hara, Masatoshi Taniuchi, Nagakazu Shimada.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of post-operative femoral bone tunnel communication after anterior cruciate ligament double-bundle reconstruction (ACL-DBR) with two drilling techniques by transparent 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and elucidate the factors associated with post-operative femoral bone tunnel communication.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients underwent ACL-DBR using outside-in technique (Group A, 25 patients) and transportal technique (Group B, 30 patients) for the drilling of femoral tunnel. CT was taken at 1 week and 6 months post-operatively. The femoral and tibial bone tunnel orientation, position, the divergency and the distance of bone bridge between the tunnels were measured using reconstructed CT images. In order to identify the factors related to post-operative femoral bone tunnel communication, patients were divided into two groups depending on whether femoral bone tunnels communicated (Group F-C) or remained (Group F-R) at 6 months post-operatively.
RESULTS: Femoral bone tunnels in Group B were orientated horizontally and dorsally compared to those in Group A. Tunnel divergency between two femoral tunnels was greater in Group A (11.7°) than in Group B (10.0°). Average distance of bone bridge at 1 week post-operatively was 1.8 mm in Group A and 1.7 mm in Group B (n.s.). Post-operative femoral bone tunnel communication occurred in 16 patients (64 %) in Group A and in 18 patients (60 %) in Group B at 6 months after ACL-DBR, respectively (n.s.). Regarding tibial tunnels, there were no significant differences in tunnel orientation, position, divergency and incidence of post-operative tibial tunnel communication between Groups A and B. Mean distance of femoral bone bridge at 1 week in Group F-R (2.5 mm) was significantly greater than in Group F-C (1.3 mm) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of post-operative femoral tunnel communication between two techniques. To avoid post-operative femoral tunnel bone communication, more than 2 mm distance of bone bridge at surgery is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23842801     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2594-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

1.  Graft healing in the bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  S Yoshiya; M Nagano; M Kurosaka; H Muratsu; K Mizuno
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The accuracy of bone tunnel position using fluoroscopic-based navigation system in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yohei Kawakami; Takafumi Hiranaka; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Yuichi Hida; Tomoaki Fukui; Harunobu Uemoto; Minoru Doita; Mitsuo Tsuji; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Comparison of 4 femoral tunnel drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andrew I Larson; Daniel P Bullock; Tomas Pevny
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Timo Järvelä; Anna-Stina Moisala; Timo Paakkala; Antti Paakkala
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique.

Authors:  Koji Nishimoto; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kiyonori Mizuno; Yuichi Hoshino; Kouki Nagamune; Seiji Kubo; Masayoshi Yagi; Motoi Yamaguchi; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  A systematic review of the femoral origin and tibial insertion morphology of the ACL.

Authors:  Sebastian Kopf; Volker Musahl; Scott Tashman; Michal Szczodry; Wei Shen; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Comparative analysis of femoral tunnels between outside-in and transtibial double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3-dimensional computed tomography study.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Jae Ang Sim; Ji Hoon Kwak; Shin Woo Nam; Kwang Hee Kim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Evaluation of the bone bridge between the bone tunnels after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study.

Authors:  Michael E Hantes; Athanasios K Liantsis; Georgios K Basdekis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Pascal Christel; Konstantinos N Malizos
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Georges Basdekis; Claude Abisafi; Pascal Christel
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion?

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Sumito Kawamura; Hyon-Jeong Kim; Christian Dynybil; Liang Ying
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

1.  Anatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Modified Transtibial Technique.

Authors:  Dhong Won Lee; Jin Goo Kim
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-02-20

2.  One-stage revision ACL reconstruction after primary ACL double bundle reconstruction: is bone-patella tendon-bone autograft reliable?

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Yusuke Hashimoto; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Junsei Takigami; Changhun Han; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Risk Factors Related to the Presence of Meniscal Injury and Irreparable Meniscal Tear at Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Tomohiro Tomihara; Yusuke Hashimoto; Shinji Takahashi; Masatoshi Taniuchi; Junsei Takigami; Shiro Okazaki; Nagakazu Shimada
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 4.  Anteromedial Portal Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Yields Similar Outcomes to Non-AMP Femoral Drilling Double-Bundle Techniques: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Tushar Tejpal; Arnav Gupta; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Nolan S Horner; Nicole Simunovic; Devin C Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-12-11

5.  The Femoral Tunnel Drilling Angle at 45° Coronal and 45° Sagittal Provided the Lowest Peak Stress and Strain on the Bone Tunnels and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft.

Authors:  Rongshan Cheng; Huizhi Wang; Ziang Jiang; Dimitris Dimitriou; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Tsung-Yuan Tsai
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-26

6.  Comparative risk-benefit profiles of different femoral drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ning Wang; Zhenglei Zhu; Ziying Wu; Hongyi He; Haochen Wang; Wei Li; Dongxing Xie; Yilun Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.