Literature DB >> 19238359

Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Michael Elias Hantes1, Vasilios C Zachos, Athanasios Liantsis, Aaron Venouziou, Apostolos H Karantanas, Konstantinos N Malizos.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in graft orientation between transtibial (TT) and anteromedial (AM) portal technique using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Fifty-six patients who were undergoing ACL reconstruction underwent MRI of their healthy and reconstructed knee. Thirty patients had ACL reconstruction using the TT (group A), while in the remaining 26 the AM (group B) was used. In the femoral part graft orientation was evaluated in the coronal plane using the femoral graft angle (FGA). The FGA was defined as the angle between the axis of the femoral tunnel and the joint line. In the tibial part graft orientation was evaluated in the sagittal plane using the tibial graft angle (TGA). The TGA was defined as the angle between the axis of the tibial tunnel and a line perpendicular to the long axis of the tibia. The ACL angle of the normal knee in the sagittal view was also calculated. The mean FGA for group A was 72 degrees, while for the group B was 53 degrees and this was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The mean TGA for group A was 64 degrees, while for the group B was 63 degrees (P = 0.256). The mean intact ACL angle for group A was 52 degrees, while for the group B was 51 degrees. The difference between TGA and intact ACL angle was statistically significant (P < 0.001) for both groups. Using the AM portal technique, the ACL graft is placed in a more oblique direction in comparison with the TT technique in the femoral part. However, there are no differences between the two techniques in graft orientation in the tibial part. Normal sagittal obliquity is not restored with both techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19238359     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0738-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  23 in total

Review 1.  Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the new millennium: a global perspective.

Authors:  C D Harner; F H Fu; J J Irrgang; T M Vogrin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001-08-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Sang Hak Lee; Jae Chul Yoo; Hae Chan Ha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A reproducible landmark for the tibial tunnel origin in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: avoiding a vertical graft in the coronal plane.

Authors:  Christopher S Raffo; Peter Pizzarello; John C Richmond; Neil Pathare
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Iosif Gavriilidis; Efstathios K Motsis; Emilios E Pakos; Anastasios D Georgoulis; Gregory Mitsionis; Theodore A Xenakis
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: experience from Pittsburgh.

Authors:  D L Johnson; T M Swenson; J J Irrgang; F H Fu; C D Harner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  S P Arnoczky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  M H Getelman; M J Friedman
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of human anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Masaaki Takahashi; Mitsuhito Doi; Masashi Abe; Daisuke Suzuki; Akira Nagano
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Jason M Scopp; Louis E Jasper; Stephen M Belkoff; Claude T Moorman
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Myung Chul Lee; Sang Cheol Seong; Sahnghoon Lee; Chong Bum Chang; Yoon Keun Park; Hyunchul Jo; Choong Hyun Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  29 in total

1.  Transtibial versus low anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a radiographic study of femoral tunnel position.

Authors:  Cecilia Pascual-Garrido; Britta L Swanson; Kyle E Swanson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Postoperative evaluation of tibial footprint and tunnels characteristics after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with anatomic aimers.

Authors:  Amit Sahasrabudhe; Pascal Christel; Francois Anne; David Appleby; Georges Basdekis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Finite element study on the anatomic transtibial technique for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ji Yong Bae; Geon-Hee Kim; Jong Keun Seon; Insu Jeon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Knee stability, athletic performance and sport-specific tasks in non-professional soccer players after ACL reconstruction: comparing trans-tibial and antero-medial portal techniques.

Authors:  Cosimo Tudisco; Salvatore Bisicchia; Andrea Cosentino; Federica Chiozzi; Massimo Piva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-10-20

Review 5.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MR imaging findings.

Authors:  M Zappia; R Capasso; D Berritto; N Maggialetti; C Varelli; G D'Agosto; M T Martino; M Carbone; L Brunese
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-02-14

6.  MRI analysis of the attachment of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of anterior cruciate ligament using coronal oblique images.

Authors:  Yoshinari Tanaka; Yoshiki Shiozaki; Yasukazu Yonetani; Takashi Kanamoto; Akira Tsujii; Shuji Horibe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the clock face representation as used to describe the femoral intercondylar notch.

Authors:  Michael G Azzam; Christopher J Lenarz; Lutul D Farrow; Heidi A Israel; David A Kieffer; Scott G Kaar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  An Liu; Miao Sun; Chiyuan Ma; Yunlin Chen; Xinghe Xue; Peng Guo; Zhongli Shi; Shigui Yan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft and a Medial Parapatellar Portal.

Authors:  Walter Kim; Peter McQueen; Jonathan N Watson; Mark R Hutchinson
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-08-01

Review 10.  The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Francisco Lajara; Gonzalo Samitier; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.