Literature DB >> 20575700

Effect of pulse energy, frequency and length on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser fragmentation efficiency in non-floating artificial urinary calculi.

Felix Wezel1, Axel Häcker, Andreas J Gross, Maurice Stephan Michel, Thorsten Bach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripsy is the standard lithotrite in ureteroscopy. We investigated the influence of pulse frequency, energy and length on the fragmentation efficiency of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in non-floating artificial stones in vitro.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stone fragmentation efficiency of three different Ho:YAG laser devices were evaluated in vitro at different pulse energy (1.0 and 2.0 J) and frequency settings (5 and 10 Hz), resulting in a standardized output power of 10W, respectively. Where possible, pulse length was modified (350 vs 700 microsec). Each setting was performed with a 273 microm and a 365 microm fiber. Lithotripsy was conducted using non-repulsive stones consisting of soft stone (plaster of Paris) and hard stone composition (Fujirock type 4).
RESULTS: Our results showed an increased stone disintegration efficiency at higher pulse energy (2.0 J/5 Hz vs 1.0 J/10 Hz) independently of two fiber diameters and stone types applied in this study (P < 0.05 in 18 of 20 groups). Similarly, reduction of the pulse length from 700 to 350 microsec resulted in a higher stone disintegration (P < 0.05 in 13 of 16 groups). This effect was most prominent when applied to soft stones. Higher fiber diameter was not constantly associated with an increase in stone disintegration.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that an increase of pulse energy and a reduction of pulse length at a standardized output power of 10W can improve Ho:YAG laser fragmentation efficiency in vitro in nonfloating stones. These results may potentially affect clinical practice of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in impacted or large stones, when retropulsion is excluded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20575700     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  20 in total

1.  In vitro investigations of repulsion during laser lithotripsy using a pendulum set-up.

Authors:  Ronald Sroka; Nicolas Haseke; Thomas Pongratz; Volkmar Hecht; Derya Tilki; Christian G Stief; Markus Jürgen Bader
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of 365- and 550-μm laser fibers in semirigid ureteroscopic Ho:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Stavros Sfoungaristos; Ofer N Gofrit; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Dov Pode; Ezekiel H Landau; Vladimir Yutkin; Constantinos A Constantinides; Mordechai Duvdevani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: treatment aspects on the single-pulse level.

Authors:  Ronald Sroka; Thomas Pongratz; Gabriel Scheib; Wael Khoder; Christian G Stief; Thomas Herrmann; Udo Nagele; Markus J Bader
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in non-contact mode: optimization of fiber to stone working distance to improve ablation efficiency.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Paul Chiron; Laurian Dragos; Esteban Emiliani; Steeve Doizi; Laurent Berthe; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  [Ureterorenoscopy].

Authors:  A J Gross; J Rassweiler; K D Sievert; A Miernik; J Westphal; H Leyh; T R W Herrmann; P Olbert; A Häcker; A Bachmann; R Homberg; J Klein; M Schoenthaler; C Netsch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Effect of optical fiber diameter and laser emission mode (cw vs pulse) on tissue damage profile using 1.94 µm Tm:fiber lasers in a porcine kidney model.

Authors:  Benedikt Becker; Dmitry Enikeev; Petr Glybochko; Leonid Rapoport; Mark Taratkin; Andreas J Gross; Viktoriya Vinnichenko; Thomas R W Herrmann; Christopher Netsch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Basic and advanced technological evolution of laser lithotripsy over the past decade: An educational review by the European Society of Urotechnology Section of the European Association of Urology.

Authors:  Lazaros Tzelves; Bhaskar Somani; Marinos Berdempes; Titos Markopoulos; Andreas Skolarikos
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

10.  Development of an automated laser drilling algorithm to compare stone ablation patterns from different laser pulse modes.

Authors:  Nikta Rezakahn Khajeh; Timothy L Hall; Khurshid R Ghani; William W Roberts
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.