Literature DB >> 22011742

In vitro investigations of repulsion during laser lithotripsy using a pendulum set-up.

Ronald Sroka1, Nicolas Haseke, Thomas Pongratz, Volkmar Hecht, Derya Tilki, Christian G Stief, Markus Jürgen Bader.   

Abstract

Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy is a commonly used technique to treat ureteral calculi.The type of energy source used is one of the main influences of retrograd calculi propulsion. Using a momentum pendulum under-water set-up the induced momentum and the initial velocity were investigated. Pulsed laser light from three different clinically available laser systems, including a Ho:YAG laser, a frequency-doubled double-pulse (second harmonic generation, SHG) Nd:YAG laser and a flash-lamp pumped dye (FLPD) laser, were transmitted via flexible fibres of different core diameter to the front of the pendulum sinker. Single pulses at variable pulse energy, according to the clinical laser parameter settings, were applied to the target sinker, thus causing a repulsion-induced deflection which was documented by video recording. The maximum deflection was determined. Solving the differential equation of a pendulum gives the initial velocity, the laser-induced momentum and the efficiency of momentum transfer. The induced deflection as well as the starting velocity of the two short-duration pulsed laser systems (SHG Nd:YAG, FLPD) were similar (s (max) = 2-3.6 cm and v (0) = 150-200 mm/s, respectively), whereas both values were lower using the Ho:YAG laser with a long pulse duration (s (max) = 0.9--1.6 cm and v (0) = 60-105 mm/s, respectively). The momentum I induced by the Ho:YAG laser was only 50% and its transfer efficacy η (Repuls) was reduced to less than 5% of the values of the two short-pulsed laser systems. This investigation clearly showed the variable parts and amounts of repulsion using different pulsed lasers in an objective and reproducible manner. The momentum transfer efficiency could be determined without any physical friction problems. Further investigations are needed to compare stone fragmentation techniques with respect to laser repulsion and its clinical impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22011742     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-011-0992-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  24 in total

1.  Stone retropulsion during holmium:YAG lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ho Lee; R Tres Ryan; Joel M H Teichman; Jeehyun Kim; Bernard Choi; Navanit V Arakeri; A J Welch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  In vitro analysis of stone fragmentation ability of the FREDDY laser.

Authors:  Fernando C Delvecchio; Brian K Auge; Ricardo M Brizuela; Alon Z Weizer; Pei Zhong; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Effect of pulse width on object movement in vitro using holmium:YAG laser.

Authors:  Pankaj Kalra; Ngoc-Bich Le; Demetrius Bagley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Use of an antiretropulsion device to prevent stone retropulsion significantly increases the efficiency of pneumatic lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Witsanu Pengune; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  [Laser lithotripsy with automatic shut-off on tissue contact].

Authors:  N Schmeller; M Kriegmair; B Liedl; A Hofstetter; R Muschter; S Thomas; A Knipper
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Effect of holmium:YAG laser pulse width on lithotripsy retropulsion in vitro.

Authors:  David S Finley; Jasen Petersen; Corollos Abdelshehid; Michael Ahlering; David Chou; James Borin; Louis Eichel; Elspeth McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Initial experience with a pulsed dye laser for ureteric calculi.

Authors:  G M Watson; J E Wickham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Outpatient holmium laser lithotripsy using semirigid ureteroscope. Is the treatment outcome affected by stone load?

Authors:  M C Cheung; F Lee; S K Yip; P C Tam
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Lasertripsy of ureteral calculi using pulsed-dye laser with automatic shut-off after tissue contact.

Authors:  A Schmidt; F Eisenberger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Dependence of calculus retropulsion on pulse duration during Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Hyun Wook Kang; Ho Lee; Joel M H Teichman; Junghwan Oh; Jihoon Kim; Ashley J Welch
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  6 in total

1.  Calculus migration characterization during Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy by high-speed camera using suspended pendulum method.

Authors:  Jian James Zhang; Danop Rajabhandharaks; Jason Rongwei Xuan; Ray W J Chia; Thomas Hasenberg
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: treatment aspects on the single-pulse level.

Authors:  Ronald Sroka; Thomas Pongratz; Gabriel Scheib; Wael Khoder; Christian G Stief; Thomas Herrmann; Udo Nagele; Markus J Bader
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser induced lithotripsy: in-vitro investigations on fragmentation, dusting, propulsion and fluorescence.

Authors:  Maximilian Eisel; Stephan Ströbl; Thomas Pongratz; Frank Strittmatter; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Impact of pulse duration on Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy: fragmentation and dusting performance.

Authors:  Markus J Bader; Thomas Pongratz; Wael Khoder; Christian G Stief; Thomas Herrmann; Udo Nagele; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Efficacy and safety of Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy for ureteroscopic removal of proximal and distal ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Wael Y Khoder; Markus Bader; Ronald Sroka; Christian Stief; Raphaela Waidelich
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy-an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser.

Authors:  Ralf Petzold; Arkadiusz Miernik; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.226

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.