Literature DB >> 25185524

Update on lasers in urology 2014: current assessment on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser lithotripter settings and laser fibers.

Peter Kronenberg1, Olivier Traxer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to review the existing literature on holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy regarding lithotripter settings and laser fibers.
METHODS: An online search of current and past peer-reviewed literature on holmium laser lithotripsy was performed on several databases, including PubMed, SciElo, and Google Scholar. Relevant studies and original articles about lithotripter settings and laser fibers were examined, and the most important information is summarized and presented here.
RESULTS: We examine how the choice of lithotripter settings and laser fibers influences the performance of holmium laser lithotripsy. Traditional laser lithotripter settings are analyzed, including pulse energy, pulse frequency, and power levels, as well as newly developed long-pulse modes. The impact of these settings on ablation volume, fragment size, and retropulsion is also examined. Advantages of small- and large-diameter laser fibers are discussed, and controversies are highlighted. Additionally, the influence of the laser fiber is examined, specifically the fiber tip preparation and the lithotripter settings' influence on tip degradation.
CONCLUSIONS: Many technical factors influence the performance of holmium laser lithotripsy. Knowing and understanding these controllable parameters allows the urologist to perform a laser lithotripsy procedure safely, efficiently, and with few complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25185524     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1395-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  38 in total

1.  Consider Ho:YAG for low-cost, effective laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  W C Adkins; D A Dulabon; Z J Chorazy; P S Lund; L M Johnson; W V Jones
Journal:  Clin Laser Mon       Date:  1994-09

2.  Durability of reusable holmium:YAG laser fibers: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Bodo E Knudsen; Renato Pedro; Bryan Hinck; Manoj Monga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Effectiveness of high-frequency holmium:YAG laser stone fragmentation: the "popcorn effect".

Authors:  Sam N Chawla; Mark F Chang; Andrew Chang; James Lenoir; Demetrius H Bagley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Working tools in flexible ureterorenoscopy--influence on flow and deflection: what does matter?

Authors:  T Bach; B Geavlete; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy--a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Holmium:YAG lithotripsy efficiency varies with energy density.

Authors:  G J Vassar; J M Teichman; R D Glickman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Lasertripsy for ureteric stones in 120 cases: lessons learned.

Authors:  M J Coptcoat; K T Ison; G Watson; J E Wickham
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1988-06

8.  Laser-beam lithotripsy for bile duct stone via percutaneous-transhepatic cholangioscopy.

Authors:  Q L Zhang; R Fujita; Y Satake
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Urologic applications of the holmium laser: preliminary experience.

Authors:  M J Erhard; D H Bagley
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for endoscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  K Matsuoka; S Iida; M Nakanami; H Koga; A Shimada; T Mihara; S Noda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  41 in total

1.  No matter which way: IS 10 or 11/12 FRENCH access the rising new standard in kidney stone surgery 2015?

Authors:  Udo Nagele; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  T. R. W. Herrmann and T. Bach (eds.): Editorial comment on "What is relevant for Lasers in Urology?".

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Update on lasers in urology 2015.

Authors:  Thomas R W Herrmann; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in non-contact mode: optimization of fiber to stone working distance to improve ablation efficiency.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Paul Chiron; Laurian Dragos; Esteban Emiliani; Steeve Doizi; Laurent Berthe; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Impact of laser fiber tip cleavage on power output for ureteroscopy and stone treatment.

Authors:  M Haddad; E Emiliani; Y Rouchausse; F Coste; L Berthe; S Doizi; S Buttice; B Somani; O Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser induced lithotripsy: in-vitro investigations on fragmentation, dusting, propulsion and fluorescence.

Authors:  Maximilian Eisel; Stephan Ströbl; Thomas Pongratz; Frank Strittmatter; Ronald Sroka
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Stone clearance times with mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Comparison of a 1.5 mm ballistic/ultrasonic mini-probe vs. laser.

Authors:  Brennan Timm; Matthew Farag; Niall F Davis; David Webb; David Angus; Andrew Troy; Damien Bolton; Gregory S Jack
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  A scoping review of the clinical efficacy and safety of the novel thulium fiber laser: The rising star of laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Bruce Gao; Adam Bobrowski; Jason Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.

Authors:  G Bozzini; P Verze; D Arcaniolo; O Dal Piaz; N M Buffi; G Guazzoni; M Provenzano; B Osmolorskij; F Sanguedolce; E Montanari; N Macchione; K Pummer; V Mirone; M De Sio; G Taverna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.