Literature DB >> 31515606

Effect of optical fiber diameter and laser emission mode (cw vs pulse) on tissue damage profile using 1.94 µm Tm:fiber lasers in a porcine kidney model.

Benedikt Becker1, Dmitry Enikeev2, Petr Glybochko2, Leonid Rapoport2, Mark Taratkin2, Andreas J Gross3, Viktoriya Vinnichenko4, Thomas R W Herrmann5, Christopher Netsch3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ablation capacity using two Thulium fiber lasers (TFL) in a porcine kidney model.
METHODS: All tissue samples were mounted on a motorized stage for a precise speed of cutting. A continuous wave (cw) TFL and a super pulsed (SP) TFL were used at power settings of 60 and 120 W with 200 and 600 µm laser fibers. After lactate dehydrogenase staining, histological evaluation was performed to measure the vaporization volume (VV), ablation depth (AD), thermo-mechanical damage zones (TMZ), coagulation zones (CZ) and the carbonization grade (CG).
RESULTS: At 120 W, no significant differences were seen between 200 and 600 µm fibers utilizing the cw TFL regarding VV (24.6 vs. 28.2 mm3/s), AD (5.6 vs. 5.7 mm), TMZ (0 vs. 0 mm2) and CZ (18.1 vs. 12.3 mm2). Using the SP TFL, no significant differences between both fiber diameters with regard to VV (4 vs. 6.2 mm3/s), AD (2.7 vs. 3.4 mm), TMZ (1 vs. 2.6 mm2) and CZ (3.1 vs. 2.2 mm2) at 120 W were found, respectively. However, the VV of the cw TFL at 60 W was significantly less compared to 120 W using 200 and 600 µm fibers, respectively, whereas the SP TFL did not show significant differences between 60 and 120 W with regard to VV. SP TFL showed a consistently lower CG compared to cw TFL.
CONCLUSIONS: This experiment suggests that there is no significant difference using 200 or 600 µm laser fibers in cw or SP TFLs. However, the cw TFL produces a coagulation zone three to five times larger than the SP TFL regardless of the fiber diameter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In-vitro; Laser; Porcine kidney; Thulium fiber laser

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31515606     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02944-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  19 in total

Review 1.  Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: basics and physical differences.

Authors:  Thorsten Bach; Rolf Muschter; Roland Sroka; Stavros Gravas; Andreas Skolarikos; Thomas R W Herrmann; Thomas Bayer; Thomas Knoll; Claude-Clément Abbou; Guenter Janetschek; Alexander Bachmann; Jens J Rassweiler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Improved staining method for determining the extent of thermal damage to cells.

Authors:  Margaret E Sherwood; Thomas J Flotte
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.025

3.  [The isolated perfused porcine kidney model for investigations concerning surgical therapy procedures].

Authors:  Kristina Peters; Maurice Stephan Michel; Ulrike Matis; Axel Häcker
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  Preliminary evaluation of a novel side-fire diode laser emitting light at 940 nm, for the potential treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: ex-vivo and in-vivo investigations.

Authors:  Michael Seitz; Thomas Bayer; Robin Ruszat; Derya Tilki; Alexander Bachmann; Christian Gratzke; Boris Schlenker; Christian Stief; Ronald Sroka; Oliver Reich
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Old wine in new bottles?

Authors:  Christopher Netsch; Benedikt Becker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  The True Ablation Effect of Holmium YAG Laser on Soft Tissue.

Authors:  Esteban Emiliani; Michele Talso; Mattieu Haddad; Christelle Pouliquen; Jonathan Derman; Jean-François Côté; Steeve Doizi; Felix Millán; Laurent Berthe; Marie Audouin; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Retrospective Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes After Monopolar Versus Laser Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Petr Glybochko; Zhamshid Okhunov; Yuriy Alyaev; Leonid Rapoport; Dmitry Tsarichenko; Mikhail Enikeev; Nikolay Sorokin; Alim Dymov; Mark Taratkin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Complications and early postoperative outcome in 1080 patients after thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate: results at a single institution.

Authors:  Andreas J Gross; Christopher Netsch; Sophie Knipper; Jasmin Hölzel; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Feasibility and efficacy of Thulium:YAG laser enucleation (VapoEnucleation) of the prostate.

Authors:  T Bach; G Wendt-Nordahl; M S Michel; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  70 vs 120 W thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet 2 microm continuous-wave laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic ex-vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Thorsten Bach; Nina Huck; Felix Wezel; Axel Häcker; Andreas J Gross; Maurice Stephan Michel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  3 in total

1.  The impact of the laser fiber-tissue distance on histological parameters in a porcine kidney model.

Authors:  Mark Taratkin; Christopher Netsch; Dmitry Enikeev; Andreas J Gross; Thomas R W Herrmann; Dmitry Korolev; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Petr Glybochko; Benedikt Becker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Reasons to go for thulium-based anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  B Becker; C Netsch; G Bozzini; T R W Herrmann; T Bach; D Enikeev; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Thulium fiber laser utilization in urological surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Johnathan A Khusid; Raymond Khargi; Benjamin Seiden; Areeba S Sadiq; William M Atallah; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.